2016
DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2016.1141973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The governance of Olympic legacy: process, actors and mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While legacy research highlights the potential for unplanned legacies, in the case of Glasgow, the findings in this research highlight the potential within host cities to create a partnership legacy that is wide reaching through new and established network development. Consistent with Leopkey and Parent (2016) and Christie and Gibb (2015), this research proposes Glasgow has the potential to create a partnership legacy grown from innovative legacy governance, collaborative working and network creation. The element of building such stakeholder relationships can be considered as a legacy in itself for the future of the host city.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While legacy research highlights the potential for unplanned legacies, in the case of Glasgow, the findings in this research highlight the potential within host cities to create a partnership legacy that is wide reaching through new and established network development. Consistent with Leopkey and Parent (2016) and Christie and Gibb (2015), this research proposes Glasgow has the potential to create a partnership legacy grown from innovative legacy governance, collaborative working and network creation. The element of building such stakeholder relationships can be considered as a legacy in itself for the future of the host city.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…MS 18 070 Event Management E-pub Christie and Gibb (2015) suggest the growth of legacy planning research overlaps with current trends in urban governance regarding collaborative working. By highlighting the need to communicate effectively across multi-stakeholder partnerships, this emphasises the importance for successful network management to promote further understanding of event regeneration and legacy planning amongst all stakeholders (Leopkey & Parent, 2016). Preuss (2015, p. 661) argues that governments 'must start with good city planning, to fit the event into long-term city development'.…”
Section: Copyright © 2018 Cognizant Communication Corporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shine of hosting such mega-events has worn off, leading to, as in the case of Oslo's bid to host the Winter Olympics, community objection to their cities' bids (Bender, 2017), which has in turn inspired greater exploration of event assessment to justify hosting such events. Event legacy, which is what an event leaves in its wake after the event itself has concluded, has also been the subject of enhanced debate (Leopkey & Parent, 2017). Such studies have examined legacies from the perspective of legacy delivery outcomes, equal distribution of benefits in the host community, as well as the mechanisms and governance systems required for effective legacy generation (Lienhard & Preuss, 2014;Lockstone-Binney, Holmes, Shipway, & Smith, 2016;Parent & Smith-Swan, 2013;Smith, 2014).…”
Section: Robertson Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…legacy; professional; mega-events; sport; development KEYWORDS Preuss (2007) indicates that the legacy is what is left after the event and includes aspects such as 1) planned/unplanned, 2) positive/negative, and 3) tangible/intangible. In this sense, several studies have attempted to overcome the theoretical and methodological difficulties and investigated the legacy of sports mega-events (Leopkey & Parent, 2016;Preuss, 2015). Among the recurring subjects in the research on legacy are infrastructure, urban development, economics, tourism, and the environment (Agha, Fairly & Gibson, 2012;Dickson, Benson & Blackman, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%