2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1927202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How Many Dimensions are Really Being Measured?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improving governance is also central to efforts of the international community to deal with underdevelopment and post-conflict situations; e.g., the World Bank (WB) and the IMF have made support conditional on improved governance. The US Millennium Challenge Account, launched by the Bush administration in 2003, introduced an aid allocation mechanism based on competitive assessment of governance performance in developing countries (Knoll & Zloczysti, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving governance is also central to efforts of the international community to deal with underdevelopment and post-conflict situations; e.g., the World Bank (WB) and the IMF have made support conditional on improved governance. The US Millennium Challenge Account, launched by the Bush administration in 2003, introduced an aid allocation mechanism based on competitive assessment of governance performance in developing countries (Knoll & Zloczysti, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ineffective, inequitable and weakly performing land administration system leads to unofficial styles of service delivery, corruption, illiquidity of assets, limited land markets, tenure insecurity, inaccurate and unreliable records, informal settlements, unrealised investment potential in property, speculative land seizure and encroachment, idle and unproductive use of land, inequitable land distribution, social unrest and inadequate provisions of infrastructure (Zimbabwe Institute, 2012;Knoll and Zloczysti, 2011).…”
Section: Negative Impacts Of Poor Land Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also regularly cited in policy discussions, especially with reference to foreign aid (e.g., Millennium Challenge Corporation 2012). Not surprisingly, there is a healthy body of work analyzing and critiquing the WGI (e.g., Kurtz and Schrank 2007;Thomas 2009;Arndt and Oman 2006;Langbein and Knack 2009;Knoll and Zloczysti 2011).…”
Section: Governance Measures and Their Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%