Fundamentals of Geobiology 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118280874.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global Sulfur Cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing transpiration accelerates the delivery of S to the root surface. About 75–90% of the S in soils is present in the topsoil as organic compounds, and S phytoavailability can be enhanced by secreting enzymes degrading soil organic-S, either from plant roots themselves or from their associated microbial communities (Canfield and Farquhar, 2012; Lamers et al, 2012). …”
Section: Root Ideotypes For Improving the Acquisition Of Essential MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing transpiration accelerates the delivery of S to the root surface. About 75–90% of the S in soils is present in the topsoil as organic compounds, and S phytoavailability can be enhanced by secreting enzymes degrading soil organic-S, either from plant roots themselves or from their associated microbial communities (Canfield and Farquhar, 2012; Lamers et al, 2012). …”
Section: Root Ideotypes For Improving the Acquisition Of Essential MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the sulfur cycle was one of the first to be well documented in environmental microbiology (Kertesz, 2000; Canfield and Farquhar, 2012). Chemolithoautotrophic and metabolic conversion of sulfur compounds were first described in the late 19th century by Beijerinck (Kelly et al, 1997) and are of central interest in the context of environmental pollution (Kellogg et al, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. oneidensis MR-1 thus provides a close model for the general iron reduction reaction occurring in sediments. Medium [Mg 2+ ]/[Ca 2+ ] ratios and total [Na 2 SO 4 ] were set to bracket historical marine values (Ries et al, 2008;Canfield & Farquhar, 2012), with [Mg 2+ ]/[Ca 2+ ] = 0, 5, and 10, and total [Na 2 SO 4 ] = 0, 5, and 28 mM. Final medium contained 10 mM NH 4 Cl, 0.1 mM MgCl 2 , 0.1 mM KH 2 PO 4 , 0.5 g L À1 of casamino acid, 5 mM ferric hydroxide (electron acceptor), and 20 mM lactate (electron donor).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 mM of CaCl 2 was added to all treatments except for calciumfree controls. Medium [Mg 2+ ]/[Ca 2+ ] ratios and total [Na 2 SO 4 ] were set to bracket historical marine values (Ries et al, 2008;Canfield & Farquhar, 2012), with [Mg 2+ ]/[Ca 2+ ] = 0, 5, and 10, and total [Na 2 SO 4 ] = 0, 5, and 28 mM. Factorial experiments were constructed over all treatment variables and performed with 10 replicates each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%