“…The gradual turn of Weberian disenchantment from a descriptive to a normative concept, and the fading of the possibility to pursue 'good sense' in the Gramscian meaning of the word through engaged intellectual work appears to us, in a sense, two sides of the same coin. What we aim at, with this essay, is therefore to imagine a possibility of 're-enchanting' our understanding of the limits and possibilities of social change by leveraging upon a rediscovery of the pleasure principle in its public, and not in its private, form: Namely, as a powerful force of collective sense-making-a socio-cognitive and affective attitude that is often found, in its many local variations, in socio-cultural spaces that are peripheral in the power relationships of the current global order [33], and which are generally identified as the 'Global South' [34]. Despite its substantial identification with Africa, most of Latin America, and selected parts of Asia [35], rather than being characterized in literal geographical terms, the term 'Global South' is to be meant in the context of geo-political relations of power [36], both in its 'hard' and 'soft' components, i.e., not only from the point of view of military deterrence and political and economic negotiation power, but also of cultural influence [37].…”