Abstract:This paper analyses the geographical imprint of land restitution against earlier views that land reform in South Africa will result in the enlargement of former bantustans (homelands), and that it will give black people marginal land. Those views, and their underlying assumptions not only suggest that it would be difficult to dismantle apartheid geography, but also imply that land reform has the potential to reinforce that geography. This begs the question of the manner in which South Africa's land reform prog… Show more
“…By March 2011, a total of 3,326 claims had been settled in Limpopo, involving 548,044 hectares being restored to 43,667 households at a cost of R2.8 billion (CRLR ). In view of the scale of land claimed, the process of restitution is clearly still in its early stages, and is likely to remain a central and determining feature for the future of the province and its people (Ramutsindela ). Some claims include farm dwellers and workers, but they have been widely ignored as a distinct interest group in settled claims, and therefore, as we show below, are vulnerable to job loss and displacement due to the changes in land use, management and employment brought about by restitution.…”
Section: Changing Contexts and Trajectoriesmentioning
One of the less studied legacies of settler colonialism and agrarian dualism in South Africa is the substantial population of people living and working on (still mostly) white‐owned commercial farms – a feature distinct from most other countries in Southern Africa. Many farm workers and farm dwellers in South Africa experience precarious tenure, and poor housing and labour conditions. This paper explores what is happening to farm labour and to agricultural capital in Limpopo province. Findings from field research on four horticultural and livestock/game farms illustrate how economic pressures, combined with land restitution and labour migration, have produced new and contested trajectories of agrarian change – largely cementing a historical shift from independent land tenure to wage labour but also prompting diversification of livelihoods. We explore the ways in which actors on farms – workers, dwellers, owners and managers – have responded with regard to three spheres of contestation: ownership, production and employment; tenure and livelihoods; and family, gender and children. We argue that, contrary to official visions of reform, long‐term processes of agrarian change predating political transition – proletarianization, casualization and the externalization of farm labour – are being accelerated. These processes, and the ways in which they are producing new contours of social differentiation, are illustrated at farm level.
“…By March 2011, a total of 3,326 claims had been settled in Limpopo, involving 548,044 hectares being restored to 43,667 households at a cost of R2.8 billion (CRLR ). In view of the scale of land claimed, the process of restitution is clearly still in its early stages, and is likely to remain a central and determining feature for the future of the province and its people (Ramutsindela ). Some claims include farm dwellers and workers, but they have been widely ignored as a distinct interest group in settled claims, and therefore, as we show below, are vulnerable to job loss and displacement due to the changes in land use, management and employment brought about by restitution.…”
Section: Changing Contexts and Trajectoriesmentioning
One of the less studied legacies of settler colonialism and agrarian dualism in South Africa is the substantial population of people living and working on (still mostly) white‐owned commercial farms – a feature distinct from most other countries in Southern Africa. Many farm workers and farm dwellers in South Africa experience precarious tenure, and poor housing and labour conditions. This paper explores what is happening to farm labour and to agricultural capital in Limpopo province. Findings from field research on four horticultural and livestock/game farms illustrate how economic pressures, combined with land restitution and labour migration, have produced new and contested trajectories of agrarian change – largely cementing a historical shift from independent land tenure to wage labour but also prompting diversification of livelihoods. We explore the ways in which actors on farms – workers, dwellers, owners and managers – have responded with regard to three spheres of contestation: ownership, production and employment; tenure and livelihoods; and family, gender and children. We argue that, contrary to official visions of reform, long‐term processes of agrarian change predating political transition – proletarianization, casualization and the externalization of farm labour – are being accelerated. These processes, and the ways in which they are producing new contours of social differentiation, are illustrated at farm level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.