“…While discussions seeking to instate Bourdieu as a historical sociologist have drawn attention to such change in fields on an exegetical level, empirical analyses employing the field concept have dealt with these internal dynamics to a much lesser degree. Historical sociology has thus far used field theory either in comparative work, focusing on two different states of a field in time rather than on a process (e.g., Berling, 2012;Go, 2008), or it has put most of its focus on the genesis and autonomization of fields (Chalaby, 1998;Dezalay & Garth, 2006;Dromi, 2016;Ferguson, 1998;Krause, 2014;Sapiro, 2016;Strand, 2015). Where studies of fields do focus on internal transformations, their accounts of such change become less theorydriven and only cursorily reference field-theoretical concepts (e.g., Krause, 2011;Strand, 2011).…”