2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-021-09467-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic revolutions. Mobilizing a neglected Bourdieusian concept for historical sociology

Abstract: The article builds on a recent literature that has sought to underscore the relevance of Bourdieu’s field theory for historical-sociological analysis. It draws attention to symbolic revolutions, a concept that has been given short shrift in this literature and even in Bourdieu’s own expositions of his field-theoretical apparatus. The article argues that symbolic revolutions denote a universal mechanism of field-internal change which extends and complements a conceptual battery of mostly structural universals o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for Weber, the historicist objective of knowing and understanding the historical phenomenon with all its peculiarities was undoubtedly not disjoint from theoretical and methodological attention to typological generalizations, which, unlike historical and ideographic approaches, reflect the logic itself of the social sciences (Weber [1904(Weber [ ] 1949. 12 Seeking to combine interpretive description and causal explanation, the idiographic and the nomothetic, generalism and specialization, Max Weber can be seen as occupying a middle-ground position-or offering a dialectical synthesis (Petzke 2022)-between the "Mandarins" and the "Modernists" in the German field of social and political sciences of his time (Steinmetz 2009;Ringer 1969Ringer , 2004.…”
Section: The Theory Of Charisma and Its Dialectic Elements In Weberia...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for Weber, the historicist objective of knowing and understanding the historical phenomenon with all its peculiarities was undoubtedly not disjoint from theoretical and methodological attention to typological generalizations, which, unlike historical and ideographic approaches, reflect the logic itself of the social sciences (Weber [1904(Weber [ ] 1949. 12 Seeking to combine interpretive description and causal explanation, the idiographic and the nomothetic, generalism and specialization, Max Weber can be seen as occupying a middle-ground position-or offering a dialectical synthesis (Petzke 2022)-between the "Mandarins" and the "Modernists" in the German field of social and political sciences of his time (Steinmetz 2009;Ringer 1969Ringer , 2004.…”
Section: The Theory Of Charisma and Its Dialectic Elements In Weberia...mentioning
confidence: 99%