“…E is a member of E ′ [4]. In order to extend the relation (2.2) to the space of distributions, considered a lemma to prove…”
Section: Let (H αβ F ) (ξ) Is a Testing Function Space For Generalizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Since the testing function space (h α,β f ) (ξ) , L (w, z) and L (w)are subspace of E , the space of distributions of compact support E ′ is a subspace of all the generalized function space z) and L ′ (w) [4]. Therefore the restriction of f ∈ L ′ (w) to L (w, z) is in z) to E is a member of E ′ .…”
Section: ) Is a Linear And Continuousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laplace transform of a function of a function f (t) ∈ L (0, ∞) is defined by the equation [1] L (f ; p) = ∫ ∞ 0 e −pt f (t) dt ; (Re (p) > 0) (1.1) and Malgonde [4] investigated the variant of the generalized Hankel-Clifford transform defined by…”
In this study a relation between the Laplace transform and the generalized Hankel-Clifford transform is established. The relation between distributional generalized Hankel-Clifford transform and distributional one sided Laplace transform is developed. The results are verified by giving illustrations. The relation between fractional Laplace and fractional generalized Hankel-Clifford transformation is also established. Further inversion theorem considering fractional Laplace and fractional generalized Hankel-Clifford transformation is proved in Zemanian space.
“…E is a member of E ′ [4]. In order to extend the relation (2.2) to the space of distributions, considered a lemma to prove…”
Section: Let (H αβ F ) (ξ) Is a Testing Function Space For Generalizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Since the testing function space (h α,β f ) (ξ) , L (w, z) and L (w)are subspace of E , the space of distributions of compact support E ′ is a subspace of all the generalized function space z) and L ′ (w) [4]. Therefore the restriction of f ∈ L ′ (w) to L (w, z) is in z) to E is a member of E ′ .…”
Section: ) Is a Linear And Continuousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laplace transform of a function of a function f (t) ∈ L (0, ∞) is defined by the equation [1] L (f ; p) = ∫ ∞ 0 e −pt f (t) dt ; (Re (p) > 0) (1.1) and Malgonde [4] investigated the variant of the generalized Hankel-Clifford transform defined by…”
In this study a relation between the Laplace transform and the generalized Hankel-Clifford transform is established. The relation between distributional generalized Hankel-Clifford transform and distributional one sided Laplace transform is developed. The results are verified by giving illustrations. The relation between fractional Laplace and fractional generalized Hankel-Clifford transformation is also established. Further inversion theorem considering fractional Laplace and fractional generalized Hankel-Clifford transformation is proved in Zemanian space.
A relation between the Laplace transform and the generalized Hankel-Clifford transform is obtained. An attempt has been made to establish the relation between distributional generalized Hankel-Clifford transform and distributional one sided Laplace transform. The results are verified by giving illustrations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.