2015
DOI: 10.1515/tmj-2015-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perspective on fractional Laplace transforms and fractional generalized Hankel-Clifford transformation

Abstract: In this study a relation between the Laplace transform and the generalized Hankel-Clifford transform is established. The relation between distributional generalized Hankel-Clifford transform and distributional one sided Laplace transform is developed. The results are verified by giving illustrations. The relation between fractional Laplace and fractional generalized Hankel-Clifford transformation is also established. Further inversion theorem considering fractional Laplace and fractional generalized Hankel-Cli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these look very much like a regular Laplace transform [1,30,25,44], while others look quite different [45,15,47]. The k-Laplace transforms [47] look a bit more like Mellin transforms, while the definitions used by Sharma [45], Deshmukh and Gudadhe [15], and Gorty [18] involve cotangents and cosecants in the exponential Laplace kernel. To be sure, the regular Laplace transform has also been used to tackle fractional differential equations, often resulting in a Mittag-Leffler expansion solution [39].…”
Section: Integral Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these look very much like a regular Laplace transform [1,30,25,44], while others look quite different [45,15,47]. The k-Laplace transforms [47] look a bit more like Mellin transforms, while the definitions used by Sharma [45], Deshmukh and Gudadhe [15], and Gorty [18] involve cotangents and cosecants in the exponential Laplace kernel. To be sure, the regular Laplace transform has also been used to tackle fractional differential equations, often resulting in a Mittag-Leffler expansion solution [39].…”
Section: Integral Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%