2013
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.282.4401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genera in the second catalogue (1833–1836) of Dejean’s Coleoptera collection

Abstract: All genus-group names listed in the second edition of the catalogue (1833-1836) of Dejean’s beetle collection are recorded. For each new genus-group name the originally included available species are listed and for generic names with at least one available species, the type species and the current status are given. Names available prior to the publication of Dejean’s second catalogue (1833-1836) are listed in an appendix.The following new synonymies are proposed: Cyclonotum Dejean, 1833 (= Dactylosternum Wolla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one side, the first citation of Lychnuris klugii was indeed on a "page 28", but in 1852, not 1853. However, we interpret that in Motschulsky 1852: 28, L. klugii is a nomen nudum, as the synopsis given regards the genus Lychnuris Dejean, 1833 (valid fide Bousquet & Bouchard, 2013), not the species. The correct reference of the species description, as listed above, is Motschulsky, 1853: 4.…”
Section: Figs 17a-m 22mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On one side, the first citation of Lychnuris klugii was indeed on a "page 28", but in 1852, not 1853. However, we interpret that in Motschulsky 1852: 28, L. klugii is a nomen nudum, as the synopsis given regards the genus Lychnuris Dejean, 1833 (valid fide Bousquet & Bouchard, 2013), not the species. The correct reference of the species description, as listed above, is Motschulsky, 1853: 4.…”
Section: Figs 17a-m 22mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed, Dejean (1833) cited Lychnuris klugii in his second catalog, but without a description, making it therefore a nomen nudum (cf. Bousquet and Bouchard 2013). The correct authorship of the species belongs to Motschulsky (1853), who in first provided a description for Lychnacris klugii.…”
Section: Figs 17a-m 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have checked it and, pending confirmation by a specialist in Tenebrionidae, consider it to be a syntype, and the nominal species to be an overlooked synonym of Cyrtoderes cristatus (DeGeer, 1778). This species is not recorded in the Coleopterorum Catalogus [Gebien (1910) did not include the name Cyrtoderes but did include as valid the genus Phligra Laporte, 1840, a junior synonym of Cyrtoderes Dejean, 1834 (Bousquet and Bouchard 2013); if present the species name cristatus would have been included under this genus].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further three genera have been synonymyzed with non-macrodactyline genera: Apterodema Fairmaire, 1884 (a synonym of Sericoides Guérin-Méneville, 1839, Sericoidini), Hilarianus Blanchard, 1850 (a synonym of Liogenys) and Zabacana Saylor, 1946 (a synonym of Epectinaspis Blanchard, 1851, Rutelinae) (Cherman et al 2016;Martínez 1972;Paucar-Cabrera 2003). The name Epicaulis Dejean nomem nudum (see Bousquet & Bouchard 2013) was sometimes improperly included in Macrodactylini (e.g., Dalla Torre 1913).…”
Section: Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Philochloenia Dejean, 1833 was an available name with remarkable historical problems of misspelling and misapplication (see Smith & Evans 2005: 41). Bousquet & Bouchard (2013)…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%