The Gender Gaps in Identity and Political Attitudes among American Indians

Abstract

While there is much research examining gender gaps in political attitudes, there is less examining how gender gaps differ within social groups. This article helps fill that void by examining gender gaps among American Indians. Using two surveys, the initial findings suggest that among American Indians, women have a stronger American Indian identity, are more likely to support women's/compassion issues, and are more likely to be Democrats. It further finds that the gender gap in party is more likely the result of the gender gap in compassion issues than in American Indian identity. Additional analysis finds that among American Indians who prioritize their American Indian identity, the partisan gender gap is reversed, with men being significantly more likely to be Democrats. Although this study finds some similarities between the gaps among American Indians and whites, it also finds some unique gaps among American Indians. This suggests the need to look at the intersectionality of gender and social groups to fully understand the gender gaps.

The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance

“…Mills 1997)—may have important consequences for democratic participation, including attending political discussion groups. Furthermore, in countries such as Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and other settler colonies, Indigeneity may intersect with gender in important ways to impact participation in political discussion groups and other political practices (Alfred, Pitawanakwat, and Price 2007; Harell and Panagos 2013; Herrick 2018). As such, my measure of “ethnicity” is a three-category variable indicating whether a respondent is White (coded White = 1), a “visible minority” (non-White, non-Indigenous, coded visible minority = 2), or Indigenous (self-identifies as Aboriginal, First Nations, Métis, or Inuit, coded Indigenous = 3) 4 .…”

“…The political attitudes of women of color are developed through intersecting experiences of racism, colonialism, patriarchy, and labor exploitation and may manifest in forms of political engagement that differ from White women's political engagement. Research shows that gender intersects with race or ethnicity (Gay and Tate 1998) and Indigeneity in colonial/postcolonial contexts (Harell and Panagos 2013; Herrick 2018) to impact the attitudes and democratic participation of visible minority and Indigenous women and men in distinct ways. Empirical intersectionality research shows that the effects of mutually constitutive categories of (dis)empowerment vary across groups, attitudes, and practices (Weldon 2006).…”

Voter registration and political knowledge among American Indians

“…In addition to employing a different measure of voter registration, this research examines American Indians' political knowledge, and the role of military service for influencing political engagement. Other recent examples of scholarly research that utilizes national surveys to study American Indian political behavior and attitudes include Herrick (2018) on the presence of the gender gap for partisanship (resembles the rest of the United States), and Koch (2016), who finds that American Indians disproportionately self-identify as Democrat and non-partisan 9…”

Gendered Views in a Feminist State: Swedish Opinions on Crime, Terrorism, and National Security

“…Considerable attention within the field of political science has been devoted to research on the gender gap in attitudes (Conover 1988; Haider-Markel and Vieux 2008; Hatemi, Medland, and Eavens 2009; Herrick 2018; Kaufmann and Petrocik 1999; McCue and Gopoian 2000) between women’s and men’s political preferences and voting behavior. Although the gender gap is small in empirical terms, its existence is established on a wide range of public policy issues (Hurwitz and Smithey 1998).…”