Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2010: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray 2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.857736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GEMS photoelectric x-ray polarimeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for large regions of the parameter space, the approximate degeneracy between the black hole spin a and the deviation parameter 3 will make it difficult to distinguish between GR and non-GR models. The GEMS mission achieves the best sensitivity (∼1% polarization degree for a mCrab source) with a photoelectric effect polarimeter operating over the 2-10 keV energy range (Black et al 2010). GEMS would be able to detect the polarization of the X-ray emission from bright X-ray binaries like Cyg X-1 and GRS 1915 + 105 with an excellent signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for large regions of the parameter space, the approximate degeneracy between the black hole spin a and the deviation parameter 3 will make it difficult to distinguish between GR and non-GR models. The GEMS mission achieves the best sensitivity (∼1% polarization degree for a mCrab source) with a photoelectric effect polarimeter operating over the 2-10 keV energy range (Black et al 2010). GEMS would be able to detect the polarization of the X-ray emission from bright X-ray binaries like Cyg X-1 and GRS 1915 + 105 with an excellent signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next few years, it may become possible to confront GR with new types of experimental data. In this paper, we discuss non-imaging spectropolarimetric X-ray observations of stellar mass black holes enabled by a mission like GEMS (Gravity and Extreme Magnetism SMEX) (Black et al 2010) or BEST (Black Hole Evolution and Space Time) (Krawczynski et al 2012). Other electromagnetic observations with the potential to test strong gravity GR include pulsar timing observations (Wex & Kopeikin 1999), radio imaging of supermassive black holes (e.g., Doeleman et al 2009), time-resolved X-ray observations of the Fe Kα fluorescent line from galactic and extragalactic black holes (e.g., Reynolds & Nowak 2003;Guainazzi 2009), and the observation of stars orbiting the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way Merritt et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique by Sakurai et al (2004) exploits CCDs to detect the UV scintillation images of photoelectron tracks in a Capillary Gas Proportional Counter. The photoelectric effect in a gas is also exploited in time projection chambers for GEMS (Black et al 2010). A high quantum efficiency is obtained at the expense of imaging, while its 1D imaging capability is very much blurred by inclined penetration (see Section 2), due to focusing, in astronomical implementations (Jahoda 2010) with a consequently much larger background.…”
Section: Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…181]), an IXO-type highthroughput soft X-ray observatory (measurement of the spins of a sample of SMBHs through Fe K-α observations) [182], a GEMS-type high-sensitivity X-ray polarimeter (geometry of accretion disk coronae and magnetic field structure in jets) [183], and the next-generation Cherenkov Telescope Array (time resolved observations of blazars and mapping of the γ-ray emission from radio galaxies) [184].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%