2006
DOI: 10.1362/026725706778935646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gay Family in the Ad: Consumer Responses to Non-traditional Families in Marketing Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most participants preferred the family-centered theme (found in prototypes #1 and #4). This finding is consistent with the literature that points out the prevalence and embrace of family imagery as an important value in modern advertising (Aaker and Williams 1998;Borgerson et al 2006;Cortese 2007;Lin 2001). Participants also discussed the need for different colors in our prototypes, such as red and white, to show emphasis and urgency.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Most participants preferred the family-centered theme (found in prototypes #1 and #4). This finding is consistent with the literature that points out the prevalence and embrace of family imagery as an important value in modern advertising (Aaker and Williams 1998;Borgerson et al 2006;Cortese 2007;Lin 2001). Participants also discussed the need for different colors in our prototypes, such as red and white, to show emphasis and urgency.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This flexible technique allows advertisements to be noticed by homosexual consumers and to go unnoticed by straight consumers (Clark 2000;Rohlinger 2002;Schroeder and Borgerson 2003;Borgerson et al 2006). Gay window advertising leaves ambiguous the sexual preference of and/or relationship between the ad's subjects.…”
Section: Concerns In Association With Gay-themed Advertising In Mainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gay window advertising leaves ambiguous the sexual preference of and/or relationship between the ad's subjects. Such advertising, by featuring a lone individual or individuals of the same sex, avoids explicit references to both homo-and heterosexuality (Borgerson et al 2006). Gay advertising also displays implicit gay imagery such as gay symbolism (Peñaloza 1996;Grier and Brumbaugh 1999).…”
Section: Concerns In Association With Gay-themed Advertising In Mainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, consumer researchers are beginning to recognise the tacit operations of the heteronormative framework, which have informed much of gender research in marketing (Kates 1999;Bristor and Fischer 1993;Catterall et al 2005;Borgerson et al 2006;Peñaloza 1994). By prioritising the 'family/couple' as a valuable unit of consumption (O'Malley and Prothero 2007), marketers have silenced those voices whose relational practices fall outside of the heteronormative framework (Wilkes 1995).…”
Section: The 'Abject' Single: Exploring the Gendered Experience Of Simentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advertisers play a significant role in constructing the cultural imagery of the 'good life' (Catterall et al 2005), which depicts sexual attraction between heterosexual couples (Schroeder and Borgerson 1998) and reinforces the idealised image of the nuclear family (Borgerson et al 2006;Kates 1999). Leach (1968) coined the term 'the cereal packet family'…”
Section: The Heterosexual Imaginary In Marketing and Consumer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%