2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2005.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gauss–Bonnet defect of complex affine hypersurfaces

Abstract: We study the loss of curvature at the "ends" of a hypersurface in the affine space and we express it in terms of singularities at infinity.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using arguments from differential topology and integral geometry, one sees that these invariants admit geometric characterizations that still make sense in the real case. For instance, the multiplicity of a complex analytic germ is equal to its density [Dra] and the μ * -sequence, the polar multiplicities and the generic polar intersection multiplicities are related to curvature integrals (see [La,Loe,Dut1,SiTi2]). Unfortunately, in the real situation, these geometric quantities do not belong to discrete sets and therefore, one cannot expect results relating their constancy to regularity conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using arguments from differential topology and integral geometry, one sees that these invariants admit geometric characterizations that still make sense in the real case. For instance, the multiplicity of a complex analytic germ is equal to its density [Dra] and the μ * -sequence, the polar multiplicities and the generic polar intersection multiplicities are related to curvature integrals (see [La,Loe,Dut1,SiTi2]). Unfortunately, in the real situation, these geometric quantities do not belong to discrete sets and therefore, one cannot expect results relating their constancy to regularity conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using arguments from differential topology and integral geometry, one sees that these invariants admit geometric characterizations that still make sense in the real case. For instance, the multiplicity of a complex analytic germ is equal to its density [Dra] and the µ * -sequence, the polar multiplicities and the generic polar intersection multiplicities are related to curvature integrals (see [La,Loe,Dut1,SiTi2]). Unfortunately, in the real situation, these geometric quantities do not belong to discrete sets and therefore, one cannot expect results relating their constancy to regularity conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our Theorems C and D are, in a way, a continuation of Langevin [10] (total curvature), Garcia Barosso and Teissier [1] (concentration of curvature). The work of Siersma and Tibar [14] is in a different direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%