The future of international political economy: Introduction to the 20th anniversary issue of RIPE

Johnson, Juliet; Mügge, Daniel; Seabrooke, Leonard; Woll, Cornelia; Grabel, Ilene; Gallagher, Kevin P.

doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.835275

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reflecting on the historical contingency of conclusions drawn by IPE scholars in previous decades, Johnson et al (2013) posed a question to all those working in the discipline:…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Now, the crisis has become a key inflection point in thinking about growing challenges to global economic governance, such as financial instability, inequality and overaccumulation. According to the editors of this journal's 20th anniversary issue, it "laid bare some fundamental challenges for all contemporary IPE scholarship" (Johnson et al, 2013. Such post-crisis stock-taking has been infused with a sense that international political economy (IPE) scholarship before and immediately after the crisis did not pay enough attention to big picture trends in the world we study (Cohen, 2009;Drezner & McNamara, 2013;Helleiner, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We view the crisis as a structural break that destabilised ideas and institutions, for example the G7, that had already become out of step with political economic reality. For IPE scholarship, too, the crisis demonstrated many apparently stable patterns to be historically contingent and fragile (Johnson et al, 2013). The field of International Relations has also recently begun to interrogate its understanding of the 'when and how' of change (Paul, 2018, p. 177).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis

Christensen

Hearson

2019

Review of International Political Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The financial crisis of 2007-2009 is now broadly recognised as a once-in-a-generation inflection point in the history of global economic governance. It has also prompted a reconsideration of established paradigms in international political economy (IPE) scholarship. Developments in global tax governance open a window onto these ongoing changes, and in this essay we discuss four recent volumes on the topic drawn from IPE and beyond, arguing against an emphasis on institutional stability and analyses that consider taxation in isolation. In contrast, we identify unprecedented changes in tax cooperation that reflect a significant contemporary reconfiguration of the politics of global economic governance writ large. To develop these arguments, we discuss the links between global tax governance and four fundamental changes underway in IPE: the return of the state through more activist policies; the global power shift towards large emerging markets; the politics of austerity and populism; and the digitalisation of the economy.

show abstract

“…Reflecting on the historical contingency of conclusions drawn by IPE scholars in previous decades, Johnson et al (2013) posed a question to all those working in the discipline:…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis

Christensen

Hearson

2019

Review of International Political Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The debate about the Second Image Reversed had an sizable impact on the discipline of International Political Economy, mainly in the US. 6 Even though other debates had arisen over the years (JOHNSON et al, 2013), making their mark on the discipline, e.g. financial governance, banking regulation, or institutions, concerns about the impact that the international system has over domestic economies continues to drive significant parts of research.…”

Section: Thus Part Of What Lake (2006) Callsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The domestic risk of chinese partnerships: cross-conditionality and coalition building

Angel

2020

Conjuntura Austral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empréstimos chineses se tornaram alternativas viáveis de financiamento durante a onda rosa devido à ausência de cláusulas de condicionalidade tradicionais. No entanto, essas operações financeiras, além de outras de diversos tipos, implicam com frequência a condicionalidade cruzada. Contrário à condicionalidade tradicional, a condicionalidade cruzada implica que operações nas áreas de comércio, financeira ou de ajuda ao desenvolvimento sejam prejudicadas em resposta a decisões de autoridades nacionais que mudem condições de projetos paralelos. O objetivo do presente trabalho é explorar as possíveis consequências políticas da condicionalidade cruzada nos assuntos domésticos dos países da América Latina. A hipótese é que a condicionalidade cruzada representa um risco similar àquele da condicionalidade tradicional em termos de autonomia nacional, mas por motivos diferentes. Se conclui que a condicionalidade cruzada afeta os esforços governamentais de construção de uma coalizão de governo devido aos impactos potenciais que ela possa ter sobre parceiros importantes do mesmo. No Brasil, o setor agroexportador, parceiro chave da coalizão de governo atual, seria aquele que poderia ser potencialmente afetado se o governo chinês decide implementar a condicionalidade cruzada como medida de retaliação a políticas ou declarações hostis do governo brasileiro a respeito de interesses chineses.

show abstract

“…In many ways, little has changed. Recent debates have questioned if OEP has hollowed out systemic and network-based thinking by concentrating on a reductionist logic of interaction (Johnson et al 2013;Oatley 2011). The USbased opponents to OEP argue that the approach ignores important systemic effects while concentrating on relationships between discrete actors, and that such reductionism is not a requirement for methodologically rigorous IPE scholarship (Oatley and Winecoff 2015).…”

Section: One School Two or Many?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The networks and niches of international political economy

Seabrooke

Young

2017

Review of International Political Economy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We analyze the organizational logics of how social clustering operates within International Political Economy (IPE). Using a variety of new data on IPE publishing, teaching, and conference attendance, we use network analysis and community detection to understand social clustering within the field. We find that when it comes to publishing and intellectual engagement, IPE is highly pluralistic and driven by a logic of 'niche proliferation'. Teaching IPE, however, is characterized by a 'reduction to polarity' that emphasizes a dualism in ontological and epistemological frames. In the face of competitive exclusion pressures, intellectual communities regenerate themselves by constructing niches while simultaneously nodding to a common tradition.

show abstract

The future of international political economy: Introduction to the 20th anniversary issue of RIPE

Cited by 8 publications

References 49 publications

The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis

The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis

The domestic risk of chinese partnerships: cross-conditionality and coalition building

The networks and niches of international political economy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About