The Future of Insect Resistance Management

Onstad, David W.

doi:10.1016/b978-012373858-5.50016-2

Cited by 39 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…pesticideresistance.com/; ref. 2). To reduce reliance on insecticide sprays, corn and cotton have been genetically engineered to produce insecticidal crystal (Cry) proteins derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops

Tabashnik

2008

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

124

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops

Tabashnik

2008

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

124

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To avoid multiple resistance, we need to adopt the IPM approach [7]. Therefore, we will extend our single pest population growth model to include natural enemies in the future.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, in order to fight pesticide resistance and based on a knowledge of the genetics of the development of pesticide resistance, a number of principles have been proposed aimed at delaying the emergence of resistance or avoiding it entirely. These principles include pesticide rotation or switching, avoiding unnecessary pesticide applications, using non-chemical control techniques [5], and leaving untreated refuges where susceptible pests can survive, within the concept of integrated pest management (IPM) [6][7][8][9][10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analytical methods for detecting pesticide switches with evolution of pesticide resistance

Liang

Tang

Nieto

et al. 2013

Mathematical Biosciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citation for this version held on GALA:Liang, Juhua, Tang, Sanyi, Nieto, Juan J. and Cheke, Robert A. (2013) After a pest develops resistance to a pesticide, switching between different unrelated pesticides is a common management option, but this raises the following questions: (1) What is the optimal frequency of pesticide use? (2) How do the frequencies of pesticide applications affect the evolution of pesticide resistance? (3) How can the time when the pest population reaches the economic injury level (EIL) be estimated and (4) how can the most efficient frequency of pesticide applications be determined? To address these questions, we have developed a novel pest population growth model incorporating the evolution of pesticide resistance and pulse spraying of pesticides. Moreover, three pesticide switching methods, threshold condition-guided, density-guided and EIL-guided, are modelled, to determine the best choice under different conditions with the overall aim of eradicating the pest or maintaining its population density below the EIL. Furthermore, the pest control outcomes based on those three pesticide switching methods are discussed. Our results suggest that either the density-guided or EIL-guided method is the optimal pesticide switching strategy, depending on the frequency (or period) of pesticide applications.

show abstract

“…The situation when all susceptible individuals are totally eliminated by a given chemical but the most resistant ones still remain alive in the population leads to the increase in the selection for resistant genes. The way to prevent resistance can be achieved by avoiding unnecessary insecticide applications by using nonchemical control techniques and leaving untreated refuges where susceptible insects can survive (Boerboom 2001 ;Onstad 2008 ).…”

Section: Resistance Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of Insect Resistance to Plant Biopesticides: An Overview

Tangtrakulwanich

Reddy

2014

Advances in Plant Biopesticides

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) and botanical biochemical pesticides have been widely used as alternative pesticides to synthetic chemical insecticides in the cropping industry. Usually, it takes longer for insects to develop a resistance to such alternative pesticides because these pesticides have broad or non-specifi c mode of actions. The fact that they are naturally derived pesticides and have multiple modes of action does not mean they are less susceptible to resistance. This review provides information about the resistance development in insect population against PIPs ( Bt crop) and botanical pesticides. The mechanisms of resistance, evidence of resistance to these biopesticides, resistance management, and future trend for plant biopesticides are discussed.

show abstract

The Future of Insect Resistance Management

Cited by 39 publications

References 36 publications

Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops

Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops

Analytical methods for detecting pesticide switches with evolution of pesticide resistance

Development of Insect Resistance to Plant Biopesticides: An Overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About