2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810763106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to several examples of successful management of insecticide resistant insect pests in which heterozygous resistant individuals are killed by the recommended insecticide field rates (Roush and McKenzie, 1987). Thus, heterozygous insecticide resistance alleles are often functionally recessive in the field under insecticide selection and this phenomenon has provided the basis for successful application of a high-dose refuge strategy to significantly delay and minimize insecticide resistance evolution in transgenic Bt crops (Tabashnik, 2008). In our study at high diclofop-methyl rates incomplete dominance was evident (Figure 1) but, herbicides cannot be used at very high doses because of regulatory restrictions, crop selectivity or cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is in contrast to several examples of successful management of insecticide resistant insect pests in which heterozygous resistant individuals are killed by the recommended insecticide field rates (Roush and McKenzie, 1987). Thus, heterozygous insecticide resistance alleles are often functionally recessive in the field under insecticide selection and this phenomenon has provided the basis for successful application of a high-dose refuge strategy to significantly delay and minimize insecticide resistance evolution in transgenic Bt crops (Tabashnik, 2008). In our study at high diclofop-methyl rates incomplete dominance was evident (Figure 1) but, herbicides cannot be used at very high doses because of regulatory restrictions, crop selectivity or cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This evidence is unsatisfying because it does not allow analysis of longer-term developments. For example, resistance build-up in pest populations or growing importance of secondary pests may potentially lower Bt benefits over time (22)(23)(24). Second, most impact studies do not properly control for nonrandom selection bias (17), which may occur when more successful farmers adopt the new technology earlier or more widely (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolution of resistance by pests is the primary threat to the continued efficacy of Bt crops (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Analysis of monitoring data suggests that the refuge strategy, which requires non-Bt host plants near Bt crops to promote survival of susceptible pests, has delayed pest resistance to Bt crops (4,7). Although Bt crops have remained effective against most targeted pest populations, 3 cases have been reported of field-evolved pest resistance to Bt crops that produce only 1 toxin (4,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%