2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fracture load and failure types of veneered anterior zirconia crowns: An analysis of normal and Weibull distribution of complete and censored data

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the fracture load of veneered anterior zirconia crowns using normal and Weibull distribution of complete and censored data. METHODS: Standardized zirconia frameworks for maxillary canines were milled using a CAD/CAM system and randomly divided into 3 groups (N=90, n=30 per group). They were veneered with three veneering ceramics, namely GC Initial ZR, Vita VM9, IPS e.max Ceram using layering technique. The crowns were cemented with glass ionomer cement on metal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher Weibull modulus indicates lower variability of strength, due to flaws and defects in the material [47,48]. In Weibull statistics, the characteristic strength (s) represents the 63.21 percentile of strength distribution [48,49]. In the present study, the fracture load data were supported with Weibull distribution, in which failure probability can be predicted at any level of stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher Weibull modulus indicates lower variability of strength, due to flaws and defects in the material [47,48]. In Weibull statistics, the characteristic strength (s) represents the 63.21 percentile of strength distribution [48,49]. In the present study, the fracture load data were supported with Weibull distribution, in which failure probability can be predicted at any level of stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…A higher Weibull modulus indicates lower variability of strength, due to flaws and defects in the material [47,48]. In Weibull statistics, the characteristic strength (s) represents the 63.21 percentile of strength distribution [48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although the shear bond strength data suggest, that the application and polymerization of the resin infiltrant on the dentin surfaces did not impair the demineralizing and adhesive efficacy of the self-etching adhesive, the Weibull modulus m is remarkably low in this group indicating low reliability [21]. Also, the amount of cohesive failures is reduced compared to the control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Consequently, a fractographical failure analysis is impossible for the data at hand and we are unable to decide if multiple flaws might control the distribution. In a case where we had pictures, we could have applied the methodology suggested by Jakus et al [38] or Johnson [39] which was successfully utilised in Stawarczyk et al [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%