2019
DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20190006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge

Abstract: Objective Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Methods Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were permitted to perform three repetitions for familiarization prior to formal testing. Physical functional outcomes The primary physical function outcome of interest was performance of 5-times sit-to-stand test (5 × STS) at hospital discharge since it is a fundamental component of mobility and an independent measure of muscle strength and power [ 42 ]. The short performance physical battery (SPPB) [ 43 , 44 ], six-minute walk distance (6MWD) [ 45 , 46 ] and clinical frailty scale (CFS) were assessed at hospital discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were permitted to perform three repetitions for familiarization prior to formal testing. Physical functional outcomes The primary physical function outcome of interest was performance of 5-times sit-to-stand test (5 × STS) at hospital discharge since it is a fundamental component of mobility and an independent measure of muscle strength and power [ 42 ]. The short performance physical battery (SPPB) [ 43 , 44 ], six-minute walk distance (6MWD) [ 45 , 46 ] and clinical frailty scale (CFS) were assessed at hospital discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate, validate and evaluate the transferability of the automated sensor system, a second test was selected. The FTSTS test also incorporates basic motion linked to daily activities [20], but it complements TUG in assessing strength of lower limbs and durability, is time based and identifies fall risk [21]. Both TUG and FTSTS tests are approved by the NHS.…”
Section: Measured Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the clinical usefulness of the instrument, the clinical experience of each of the examiners with it was considered, in addition to information obtained in the literature. Thus, the instruments selected were: Berg balance scale 15 ; modified Ashworth scale 16 ; esthesiometry 17 ; goniometry 18 ; Barthel index 19 ; lower extremity motor coordination test (Lemocot) 20 ; functional independence measure 21 , mini-mental state examination 22 , Medical Outcomes Study: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) 23 ; incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) 24 ; heel-shin test 25 ; block box testing 26 ; six-minute walk test (6MWT) 27 ; Romberg balance test 28 ; sit and stand test 29 ; test of going up and downstairs 30 ; 10-meter walking speed test 30 ; finger-nose test 26; test of nine pins and nine holes 26 ; and timed up and go test (TUG) 30 .…”
Section: Cross-cultural Translation and Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%