2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704198104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first skull of the earliest giant panda

Abstract: Fossils of the giant panda Ailuropoda (Order Carnivora, Family Ursidae) are largely isolated teeth, mandibles, and a few rare skulls, known from the late Pliocene to late Pleistocene in China and Southeast Asia. Much of this material represents a Pleistocene chronospecies, Ailuropoda baconi, an animal larger than the living giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca. The earliest certain record of Ailuropoda is the late Pliocene chronospecies, Ailuropoda microta, smaller than either A. baconi or A. melanoleuca, and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While Gigantopithecus became progressively larger through time, the contemporary Pongo became smaller from the Early to Late Pleistocene, with a possible speciation event that saw the large-sized Pongo weidenreichi replaced by the smaller Pongo devosi . The same timeframe witnessed a size change in the giant panda lineage beginning with the "pygmy" panda, Ailuropoda microta, in the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene, through the largest chronospecies, Ailuropoda baconi, in the late Pleistocene, and culminating in the relatively small extant species, Ailuropoda melanoleuca (Jin et al, 2007;Figueirido et al, 2011).…”
Section: Evolutionary Implications Of Dental Size Change In Gigantopimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While Gigantopithecus became progressively larger through time, the contemporary Pongo became smaller from the Early to Late Pleistocene, with a possible speciation event that saw the large-sized Pongo weidenreichi replaced by the smaller Pongo devosi . The same timeframe witnessed a size change in the giant panda lineage beginning with the "pygmy" panda, Ailuropoda microta, in the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene, through the largest chronospecies, Ailuropoda baconi, in the late Pleistocene, and culminating in the relatively small extant species, Ailuropoda melanoleuca (Jin et al, 2007;Figueirido et al, 2011).…”
Section: Evolutionary Implications Of Dental Size Change In Gigantopimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The teeth of Gigantopithecus blacki in Sanhe Cave are significantly larger than their counterparts at the above sites. The Gigantopithecus faunas at the above sites have yielded primitive species, such as Ailuropoda microta [10] , Cuon dudius, and Tapirs sanyuanensis; while the Sanhe fauna contains relatively advanced species, such as Ailuropoda wulingshanensis [10] , Cuon antiquus and Tapirus sinensis. Moreover, the proportion of extant species in the Sanhe fauna is higher than those of the above early Early Pleistocene faunas.…”
Section: The Age Of the Sanhe Faunamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical distribution of Gigantopithecus ranges from China to Himachal Pradesh in north India, the Potwar Plateau in north Pakistan, and Tham Khuyen Cave in Vietnam, which borders Guangxi, China. The representative faunas are from Longgupo Cave in Wushan County, Chongqing, Liucheng Gigantopithecus Cave in Guangxi, Mohui Cave in Tiandong County, Guangxi, Longgudong Cave in Jianshi County, Hubei, Tahsin Gigantopithecus Cave in Guangxi, and Nongmo Hill in Bama, Guangxi These faunas represent different ages of the Pleistocene [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and each of them has yielded Gigantopithecus blacki. Research on the dental dimensions of Gigantopithecus black indicates that a certain consistency exists in terms of size variation and that there is a tendency for a gradual increase in the size of teeth from early to late Pleistocene [14][15][16] .…”
Section: The Characteristics Of the Sanhe Faunamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this, the use of these techniques in anatomical studies of cranial internal morphology has greatly increased in the last two decades (Brochu, 2000;Colbert et al, 2005;García et al, 2007;Jin et al, 2007;Dong, 2008;Silcox et al, 2009).…”
Section: Previous Studies On the Frontal Sinuses Of Fossil Vertebratesmentioning
confidence: 99%