2011
DOI: 10.1142/s0218396x11004456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Finite Strip Method for Acoustic and Vibroacoustic Problems

Abstract: The finite strip method, widely employed in structural mechanics, is extended to solve acoustic and vibroacoustic problems. The acoustic part of the formulation, including how to handle the most typical acoustic boundary conditions and the fluid structure interaction, is presented. Several realistic problems where the three-dimensional domain of interest has extrusion symmetry are solved. These examples illustrate the advantages of the method: it has smaller computational costs than the finite element method a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical model is applied to the study of the vibration and sound transmission between two rooms separated by a T-shaped structure (Sections 3.1 and 3.4) or a single wall (Sections 3.2 and 3.3), and four rooms separated by a X-shaped junction (Section 3.5). First, in Section 3.1, the results obtained by means of the modal-spectral model are compared with the results obtained with the finite strip method (FSM) [49]. A single junction (one set of dimensions and material properties) is considered.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical model is applied to the study of the vibration and sound transmission between two rooms separated by a T-shaped structure (Sections 3.1 and 3.4) or a single wall (Sections 3.2 and 3.3), and four rooms separated by a X-shaped junction (Section 3.5). First, in Section 3.1, the results obtained by means of the modal-spectral model are compared with the results obtained with the finite strip method (FSM) [49]. A single junction (one set of dimensions and material properties) is considered.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FSM can exactly reproduce these limitations in order to make a fair comparison. For this reason, the FSM [49] is chosen in order to compare the combination of modalspectral interpolation with an element-based approach. The treatment of the Ydirection is the same in both models while the difference relies on the X − Z plane.…”
Section: Comparison With the Fsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other modelling techniques the output assigned to each cell can be a simple average of the solution. For example, the vibroacoustic problems of Section 4.3 have been solved by means of the finite strip method [22]. The vibration and pressure fields in the three-dimensional space are obtained as a combination of spatial discrete interpolation in a problem section and a modal combination in the third dimension.…”
Section: The Cluster Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the dimension of the space is equal to the number of eigenmodes considered. These modes are computed with the finite element code Cast3M [23] for vibratory problems and with an in-house code based on the finite strip method for vibroacoustic problems [22]. The eigenmodes of the problem are good samples for the cluster analysis, because each of them provides an independent and significant case to analyse.…”
Section: The Sample Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is similar to that of the finite strip method but this one is particularly suitable for multilayered structures because it allows the resolution of the Helmholtz equation at each layer, taking into account the continuity of the normal velocity at their interfaces. Moreover, due to the use of trigonometric functions in the in-plane directions, its computational cost is significantly lower than that of pure finite element analysis [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%