The Findings of Pulmonary Nocardiosis on Chest High Resolution Computed Tomography

Abstract

Objectives: Pulmonary nocardiosis is a rare opportunistic infection that is often encountered in immunocompromised patients, in particular those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and in solid organ transplant recipients. As the number of immunocompromised patients increase, it is expected that the number of patients with pulmonary nocardiosis will increase. The aim of this study is to review the chest HRCT findings of patients with confirmed pulmonary nocardiosis and to review the imaging features of pulmonary nocardiosis in the literature. Methods: We searched the electronic database of the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman for patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary nocardiosis between January 2006 and January 2019. Nine patients with pulmonary nocardiosis were identified, but three patients were excluded as no chest HRCT images were available. Patient clinical presentation was recorded and chest HRCT images were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The six patients enrolled in the study were male, aged between 29 and 49 years. Three patients were immunocompromised, two of whom had undergone a renal transplant. The main HRCT findings were cavitary nodules/masses, non-cavitary nodules/masses, septal thickening, centrilobular nodules, ground glass opacities, consolidation, pleural effusion, pleural thickening, enlarged lymph nodes and necrotic lymph nodes. Conclusion: Pulmonary nocardiosis has various findings on chest CT. Most common are pulmonary nodules and masses. Awareness of these findings can help radiologists to suggest the diagnosis in the appropriate clinical settings.
 Keywords: Nodules; Masses; Lung Infections; Opportunistic Pathogen; Pulmonary Nocardiosis; Computed Tomography.

Complex Management of Septic Joint and Cutaneous Nocardiosis in an Immunocompromised Patient: A Case Report

“…Imaging studies, such as chest X-rays or CT scans, are critical for evaluating immunocompromised patients with symptoms like dyspnea or altered mental status where there is a suspicion of disseminated disease. Notably, this patient’s imaging did not show typical Nocardiosis findings, such as cavitary or non-cavitary nodules, masses, septal thickening, and centrilobular nodules [ 9 ]. The diagnosis was facilitated by gram staining and culture of joint fluid, as evidenced in Figure 2 , highlighting the importance of these tests for identifying the pathogen and determining its antimicrobial sensitivity.…”

Metagenome next-generation sequencing plays a key role in the diagnosis and selection of effective antibiotics on the treatment of Nocardia pneumonia: a case report

“…The imaging manifestations of pulmonary Nocardia spp. infection lack specificity and can be manifested as single or multiple nodules, pulmonary mass (with or without cavity), reticular nodular infiltration, interstitial infiltration, lobar consolidation, subpleural plaque and pleural effusion ( 16 , 17 ). Imaging features like these can easily be misdiagnosed as lung cancer or viral pneumonia ( 18 – 20 ).…”

“…Drug susceptibility testing is particularly important as a guide. Literature data showed that PN is generally effective to sulfonamides antibiotics, and effective to linezolid, imipenem and amikacin ( 16 , 17 ). Antimicrobial susceptibilities for Nocardia spp.…”

Pathogenic Nocardia amamiensis infection: A rare case report and literature review

“…Radiological characteristics of chest CT images in nocardiosis include ground-glass opacities (GGOs), centrilobular nodules, nodules/masses, interlobular septal thickening, bronchial wall thickening, mucoid impaction, cavitation, intralobular reticular opacity, pleural effusion, and enlarged hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes [ 22 , 23 ]. Studies have shown that the most common combination of lung imaging findings in nocardiosis is nodules/masses and interlobular septal thickening (77.8%), while bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules are less commonly observed [ 1 , 24 ].…”

“…Sputum microbial culture is a repeated, cost-effective, and effective method, but the long culture time may result in delayed diagnosis [ 5 , 23 ]. In addition, the positive rate of bacterial smear and pathological examination of lung tissue remains low.…”