2012
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnr242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Final Log Canonical Model of the Moduli Space of Stable Curves of Genus 4

Abstract: Abstract. We describe the GIT quotient of the linear system of (3, 3) curves on P 1 × P 1 as the final non-trivial log canonical model of M 4, isomorphic to M 4(α) for 8/17 < α ≤ 29/60. We describe singular curves parameterized by M 4(29/60), and show that the rational map M 4 M 4(29/60) contracts the Petri divisor, in addition to the boundary divisors ∆1 and ∆2. This answers a question of Farkas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[HL10]). Finally, Fedorchuk [Fed11] has constructed the final nontrivial step in the Hassett-Keel program for g = 4 by using GIT for (3, 3) curves on P 1 × P 1 . In this section we identify the GIT quotient…”
Section: Hassett-keel Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[HL10]). Finally, Fedorchuk [Fed11] has constructed the final nontrivial step in the Hassett-Keel program for g = 4 by using GIT for (3, 3) curves on P 1 × P 1 . In this section we identify the GIT quotient…”
Section: Hassett-keel Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of α corresponding to our space M GIT 4 is intermediary between the slopes occurring in [HL10] and [Fed11] respectively. Proof.…”
Section: Hassett-keel Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this problem is far from complete except small genera cases [16,19], we have understood many different compactifications of M g . For example, see [17,18,13,11,21,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items (4),(5), and (6) are simple set-theoretical observations. Since ϕ A,B is a composition of smooth blow-ups, items (10),(11), and (12) are easily deduced. The rest of them come from Mumford's relation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%