2012
DOI: 10.1090/conm/564/11153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The geometry of the ball quotient model of the moduli space of genus four curves

Abstract: Abstract. S. Kondo has constructed a ball quotient compactification for the moduli space of non-hyperelliptic genus four curves. In this paper, we show that this space essentially coincides with a GIT quotient of the Chow variety of canonically embedded genus four curves. More specifically, we give an explicit description of this GIT quotient, and show that the birational map from this space to Kondo's space is resolved by the blow-up of a single point. This provides a modular interpretation of the points in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is a misleading point of view. We argue that the results in this paper have much more structure than those in the simpler geometric case discussed in [CMJL14, CMJL12] (for instance compare Corollary 1.4 to [CMJL12]). More generally, we believe that the Hassett-Keel-Looijenga program (for K3 type) has much more structure and is more regular than the Hassett-Keel program (for curves).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, this is a misleading point of view. We argue that the results in this paper have much more structure than those in the simpler geometric case discussed in [CMJL14, CMJL12] (for instance compare Corollary 1.4 to [CMJL12]). More generally, we believe that the Hassett-Keel-Looijenga program (for K3 type) has much more structure and is more regular than the Hassett-Keel program (for curves).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We note thatC is a union ofC 1 andC 2 satisfying (a) eachC i is contained in 2 and L i,3 intersect at one point q i for each i = 1, 2, and (d) L 1,j and L 2,j meet at a point p j . From Section 11.3 in [4], it is induced thatC is Chow semistable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2], Theorem 3.1) classified Chow stable and semistable points in Chow 4,1 by using the GIT analysis for cubic threefolds. Our results are partial but we make a direct computation of the stability conditions on Chow 4,1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 8 17 ) M 4 ( 8 17 ) = { * } More specifically, i) the end point M 4 ( 8 17 + ǫ) is obtained via GIT for (3, 3) curves on P 1 × P 1 as discussed in [Fed12]; ii) the other end point M 4 ( 5 9 ) is obtained via GIT for the Chow variety of genus 4 canonical curves as discussed in [CMJL12]; iii) the remaining spaces M 4 (α) for α in the range 8 17 < α < 5 9 are obtained via appropriate Hilb m 4,1 quotients, with the exception of α = 23 44 . Thus in genus 4, the remaining unknown range for the Hassett-Keel program is the interval α ∈ ( 5 9 , 2 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%