1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.873333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The feedout process: Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in uniform, radiation-driven foils

Abstract: Observation of perturbation coupling between a Richtmyer-Meshkov-unstable interface on the cold surface of a radiatively-driven foil and the Rayleigh-Taylor-unstable hot surface is reported. For the 50 m wavelength studied, the combination of pulse length and foils thickness was found to affect the strength of instability coupling. Thick ͑86 m͒ foils with a 2.2 ns long pulse showed weak coupling between the two instabilities, while thin ͑35 m͒ foils showed strong, fast coupling. An intermediate ͑50 m͒ foil thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the sources of the initial mass non-uniformity for the Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) perturbation growth in laser fusion targets is the roughness of the inner surface of the target [1][2]. The process that transfers mass perturbation from the inner to the outer surface of the target, where the RT instability develops, is called feedout.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the sources of the initial mass non-uniformity for the Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) perturbation growth in laser fusion targets is the roughness of the inner surface of the target [1][2]. The process that transfers mass perturbation from the inner to the outer surface of the target, where the RT instability develops, is called feedout.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is informative to compare oscillations of areal mass in a shock wave (due to the ripples at the front surface of the target), and in a rarefaction wave (due to the ripples at the rear surface of the target), as in the experiments [8,9] and [2], respectively. Figure 1 presents the comparison as given by analytical small-amplitude theory applied to a planar layer of ideal gas with 3 / 5 = γ , rippled from either front or rear side [3,10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedout is the physical mechanism responsible for the RT-seeding triggered by the roughness of the rear target surface [45,[51][52][53]. The RT growth begins after a shock wave initiated at the smooth irradiated surface of the target breaks out at its rippled inner (or rear, in planar geometry) surface, and a rippled rarefaction wave reflected from it reaches the front surface.…”
Section: Feedoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments 7,8 demonstrated the theoretically predicted 12 feedout-triggered areal mass oscillations in a rippled rarefaction wave that is produced in a target rippled on the rear side; see also Ref. 13. These two important cases, however, do not cover all the relevant regimes of the early-time perturbation evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid plastic is less compressible by the transmitted shock wavecompression ratio of no more than 3 -and therefore a larger value of is appropriate; 10,18 we take here Side-on measurements of the interfacial modulation amplitude x in laser-driven solid targets are difficult, but the total mass modulation amplitude m is directly measurable by the face-on radiographic diagnostics. [6][7][8][9]13 Time history of m is plotted in Transition to an accelerated target provides additional complications. After the target starts to accelerate, the classical RM interfacial growth must evolve into RT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%