Food with minimum 58% digestibility is required to cover the energetic main tenance costs of the roe-deer. It was found that the food supply of deer in w inter depends not on the amount of browse, but on its digesti bility and the possibility of supplem enting it by easily digestible foodherb layer plants, grass or leaves.-[Jagiellonian Univ., Dept. Anim. Ecol., Karasia 6, 30-060 Kraków]
INTRODUCTIONR ational h u n tin g m anagem ent involves definition of w h a t is know n as th e food carry in g capacity of a given h a b ita t , and to define this it is essential to have data on th e population's" consum ption level and food supply (Grodziński, 1975). W hen am ount of production and n a tu ra l food supply, and also consum ption, are known, it is possible to evalu ate th e d irect effect of th e population on the h a b ita t and to a rriv e a t decisions to m ain tain th e optim um n u m b er of individuals in a given area. T he studies m ade up to th e p resen t on the food supply of deer, carried out from th e aspect of am o u n t of biomass, d ry m a tte r or energy of th e food produced per u n it of area (DziQciolowski, 1970;Bobek et al., 1972;Bobek et al., 1975) are insufficient. The n a tu ra l food of d e e r is subject to considerable variations during the y early cycle, both in respect of chem ical com position and n u tritiv e value, and th erefo re intensive studies aim ed a t defining its q u ality a re essential. The n u tri tive value, and not th e am ount of food available, determ ines th e level of consum ption and its utilization by anim als (Nagy et al., 1969; M orris&Kovner, 1970; A m m a n n et al., 1973). The q u a lity of food also determ ines ra te of grow th (Newsome et al., 1968; U 11 r e y et al., 1967;Nordan et al., 1970), breeding success (N o r d a n et al., 1968), the an im al's condition, length of life, and ability to survive th rough u nfavourable w in ter conditions (U r n e s s et al., 1971).N u tritiv e value should therefore, in addition to estim ation of th e n a tu ra l food supply, be th e basic criterion for evaluating the food carrying capacity of the h a b ita t for deer. A m easure of th e n u tritiv e value of food is, according to Barnes (1965), its chem ical com position and digestibility. These tw o p a ram eters also e x e rt a decisive influence on th e an im als' food preferences in relation to d iffe re n t p lan ts (Van Dyne & Heady, 1965) and also of p arts of such plants .D eterm ination of th e digestibility of n a tu ra l food over th e y early cycle perm its of estim ating th e food supply for anim als in th e given area in categories of th e sum total of total digestible n u trie n ts (TDN), digestible energy (DE), or d ry m a tte r digestibility (DMD), w hile a know ledge of th e relatio n betw een food digestibility and its v o lu n tary intake (VI) p erm its of evaluating th e possibility of supplying th e energetic cost of th e an im als' m aintenance, depending on th e food c u rre n tly available.T he classic tim e-consum ing m ethod, invol...