“…4 Judicial decision making in a constitutional court is in part the result of personal attributes, 5 attitudes (including policy preferences), peer pressure, and intracourt interaction (a natural pressure for consensus and court reputation; a common objective to achieve supremacy of the constitutional court), and party politics (loyalty to the appointer) within a given constitu-2 See, among others, Lutz (1994), Cooter (1992), and Ramos (2006). 'For a discussion ofjudicial activism by a Continental constitutional court, see Kommers (1994) on the German case. There is also evidence of judicial activism by the French constitutional court since the early 1980s.…”