2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
322
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(356 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
19
322
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous literature has already identified possible faultlines (see table 1). Within a team there might be several different faultlines, but not all of them are activated and lead to the formation of a subgroup [26].…”
Section: Faultlines and Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature has already identified possible faultlines (see table 1). Within a team there might be several different faultlines, but not all of them are activated and lead to the formation of a subgroup [26].…”
Section: Faultlines and Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the negative effects of faultlines on performance and social integration. Jehn & Bezrukova (2010) 15) showed that groups with activated faultlines (members actually perceive subgroups based on the demographic characteristics) are more likely to form coalitions, have high levels of group conflict, and lower levels of satisfaction and group performance than dormant faultline groups. However, few previous studies have mentioned individual outcomes such as stress and work-life conflict.…”
Section: Fautlines Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior findings on conflict and team outcomes are mixed: some research has shown that task conflict and relationship conflict are detrimental to team outcomes (Amason, 1996;Brief & Weiss, 2002;Jehn, 1995Jehn, , 1997, whereas other studies have shown that task conflict can be beneficial to team outcomes (Amason, 1996;Jehn, 1995;Behfar, Mannix, Peterson, & Trochim, 2011), and there are boundary conditions to the negative relation between relationship conflict and team outcomes (Rispens, Greer, Jehn, & Thatcher, 2011 According to social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986) and self-categorization theory (Hogg & Terry, 2000;Turner, 1984), when there is a superordinate team identity, team members are cohesive and striving to achieve a common goal. Often times, identification with the team can act as "social glue" to keep team members working toward a common goal (Jehn & Bezrukova, 2010;Van Vugt & Hart, 2004 , 2010a). Dialectical reasoning is a system of thought characterized by acceptance of contradictions and inconsistencies in one's environment (Peng & Nisbett, 1999;SpencerRodgers et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Conflict Culture and Team Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in a recent meta-analysis by de Wit, Greer, and Jehn (2012), relationship and task conflicts are more negatively related to proximal team outcomes (e.g., team identity) than distal team outcomes (e.g., performance), therefore, in the current paper, I focus on a more proximal team outcome, team identity. Team identity can be defined as part of an individual's self-concept, "which derives from his or her knowledge of his or her membership in a team, together with the value and emotional significance attached to that membership" (Jehn & Bezrukova, 2010, p.28, adapted from Tajfel, 1982. When team members have a stronger team identity, their goals and values are aligned, thus, they work toward a superordinate goal and achieve greater team performance (Jehn & Bezrukova, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation