1951
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.18003915308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fate of the tumour in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, bypassing the obstruction may result in persistence of the hypertrophied muscle for many years (36). Thus, it is difficult to postulate that the undeniable abnormalities of the muscular layer are congenital, given their rapid resolution after relief of obstruction and the absence of functional or anatomic abnormalities at birth.…”
Section: Etiologic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, bypassing the obstruction may result in persistence of the hypertrophied muscle for many years (36). Thus, it is difficult to postulate that the undeniable abnormalities of the muscular layer are congenital, given their rapid resolution after relief of obstruction and the absence of functional or anatomic abnormalities at birth.…”
Section: Etiologic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been clearly shown that congenital pyloric hypertrophy can persist into adult life, unless treated by pyloromyotomy (Rammstedt, 1912;Holt, 1917;Armitage and Rhind, 1951;Lumsden and Truelove, 1958). Runstrom (1939) studied 107 children with congenital pyloric stenosis treated medically and showed that the radiological abnormalities became less frequent with advancing years, but were still present long after there were no symptoms.…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the infant is treated by gastro-jejunostomy the tumour frequently remains unaltered (Holt, 1917), even well into adult life (Donovan, 1946;Walters, 1946;Armitage and Rhind, 1951 ;and others). Indeed, the cases recorded suggest that the tumour nearly always does persist after gastrojejunostomy, though this may be an erroneous impression, as the absence of a tumour at a subsequent operation may be overlooked or not regarded as worthy of record.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%