1993
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fate of Suctioned and Surgically Removed Fat after Reimplantation for Soft-Tissue Augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
72
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon explains the loss of effective filling of facial defects already evident before the 14-month follow-up (Kononas et al, 1993). Thus, clinical correction is directly determined by the surviving adipose tissue (Smahel, 1986), while the scarring fibrous tissue does not contribute to augmenting the soft tissue volume causing the graft retraction (May, 1990;Carpaneda and Ribeiro, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon explains the loss of effective filling of facial defects already evident before the 14-month follow-up (Kononas et al, 1993). Thus, clinical correction is directly determined by the surviving adipose tissue (Smahel, 1986), while the scarring fibrous tissue does not contribute to augmenting the soft tissue volume causing the graft retraction (May, 1990;Carpaneda and Ribeiro, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde que a gordura foi proposta como material a ser utilizado para injeções intracordais 11 , muitos estudos têm abordado o problema da reabsorção da gordura no período pós-operatório e a conseqüente deterioração da qualidade vocal [4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12] . A literatura, contudo, é pobre no que tange à distribuição espacial da gordura injetada e seus efeitos sobre o contorno da borda livre, configuração glótica e alterações das propriedades viscoelásticas de cada camada da prega vocal.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…All of these may require multiple staged surgeries and even then in the best of cases may not achieve satisfactory appearance and function [2]. Autologous grafts are often considered the clinical gold standard, because allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials are associated with complications such as pathogen transmission, immune rejection, and suboptimal integration [38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Tissue Substitutes For Facial Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%