2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fate of SOFC anodes under biomass producer gas contaminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H 2 S concentrations tested were 0.8 and 1.3 ppm(v) dry basis, while for HCl 3.4, 20, and 50 ppm(v) dry basis were tested. The H 2 S and HCl concentrations were selected based on SOFC tolerance limits found in literature . Acetic acid was selected as primary tar, since it is one of the most abundant light condensable species generated from updraft gasifiers .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H 2 S concentrations tested were 0.8 and 1.3 ppm(v) dry basis, while for HCl 3.4, 20, and 50 ppm(v) dry basis were tested. The H 2 S and HCl concentrations were selected based on SOFC tolerance limits found in literature . Acetic acid was selected as primary tar, since it is one of the most abundant light condensable species generated from updraft gasifiers .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hot/ dry gas cleaning improves the system efficiency avoiding steam condensation as assessed for the FDA case in an Ni/ YSZ ASC SOFC in [33]. Besides, literature suggests that cell degradation can be avoided with the expected tar concentrations for cells with Ni/GDC anode [4]. Summing up, hot/dry gas cleaned FBS gasifier product gases seem to be the most promising biomass gasification fuels for SOFCs.…”
Section: Cell Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significantly more publications deal with cells based on Ni/YSZ anodes, possibly due to their better performance in electrochemically oxidizing hydrogen and being closer to a broad commercialization as claimed in [10,28]. But, as comprehensively reviewed in [4,29,30], cells with Ni/ GDC anode show a higher potential for the use with product gases from biomass gasification due to their higher tolerance against contaminants like H 2 S, HCl and tars in comparison to cells with Ni/YSZ anode. Moreover, this anode material is less prone to the formation of solid carbon deposits when fueled with carbonaceous gases, especially at a low SCR [31].…”
Section: Anode Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations