1999
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/164.6.410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The False-Negative Fraction: A Statistical Method to Measure the Efficacy of Cervical Smear Screening Laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equation for calculating the false-negative fraction was false-negative cases/(false-negative cases + true-positive cases). 24,25 The satisfaction of clinicians was measured indirectly by auditing the number of weekly phone calls received from physicians' offices requesting cytologic reports. Before FPGS and lean principles implementation, the mean total cycle time was 158.48 hours; the value and nonvalue-added times were 12.48 hours and 146.0 hours, respectively.…”
Section: Outcome Metrics and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation for calculating the false-negative fraction was false-negative cases/(false-negative cases + true-positive cases). 24,25 The satisfaction of clinicians was measured indirectly by auditing the number of weekly phone calls received from physicians' offices requesting cytologic reports. Before FPGS and lean principles implementation, the mean total cycle time was 158.48 hours; the value and nonvalue-added times were 12.48 hours and 146.0 hours, respectively.…”
Section: Outcome Metrics and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no simpler and more economic method for cervical cancer screening than Papanicolaou (Pap) smears. Since its introduction in 1943, a lot has been written about the specificity and sensitivity of this method, which has false-negative rates ranging from 0 to 94% [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In Venezuela, false-positive reports have been reported between 1 and 30% [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no simpler and more economic method for cervical cancer screening than Papanicolaou (Pap) smears. Since its introduction in 1943, a lot has been written about the specificity and sensitivity of this method, which has false‐negative rates ranging from 0 to 94%[1–9]. In Venezuela, false‐positive reports have been reported between 1 and 30%[10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%