“…With the perceived high costs associated with running a quality field education program it has become a vulnerable low hanging fruit for the neoliberal managerialist cost cutting agenda in the higher education sector (Cleak & Venville, 2018;Morley & Dunstan, 2013). While the tangible function of assessment and administration may be recognized by management and allocated in workloads other elements such as teaching (Agllias, Wendy, Cassano, Collingrindge, Dawood, Irwin, Lukic, Maywald, McKinnon, Noble, O'Sullivan, Wexler, & Zubrzycki, 2010;Egan & Hill, 2020;Faria, Brownstein & Smith, 1988;Olson-Morrison, et al, 2019;Rosenblum & Raphael, 1983;Smith, Faria, & Brownstien, 1986;) and relationship building (Cleak & Venville, 2018;Tully, 2005) seem to be undervalued and overlooked in workload allocation transferring these elements into the invisible workload of the academic. However, while undervalued and made invisible by management the relationship with the liaison person is often identified as most valued by students and field educators (Anderson, Drechsler, Hessenauer & Clark, 2019).…”