1977
DOI: 10.1021/jo00424a040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The facile oxidation of phenacyl bromides with N,N-dialkylhydroxylamines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of 10a appears to be unequivocal, especially since it is clearly a different compound from the N-(0-aminobeiizoyl) isomer (lla), which can be obtained by reaction of inethyl o-aminobeiizoate with liydroxylamine (8). This 0-aroylation of hydroxylaniine by isatoic anhydride evidently involves nucleophilic attack by the hydroxyl group, although formation and rearrangement of an N-oxide, via nucleophilic attack by the amino group, is feasible (9). However if the latter mechanism was operative during the reaction of 7 with hydroxylamine, the stable N-aroyl derivative ( l l a ) would arise and not the observed product 100.…”
Section: Fitzroy D Eddy Keith Vaughan Et Malcolm F G Stevens Canmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The structure of 10a appears to be unequivocal, especially since it is clearly a different compound from the N-(0-aminobeiizoyl) isomer (lla), which can be obtained by reaction of inethyl o-aminobeiizoate with liydroxylamine (8). This 0-aroylation of hydroxylaniine by isatoic anhydride evidently involves nucleophilic attack by the hydroxyl group, although formation and rearrangement of an N-oxide, via nucleophilic attack by the amino group, is feasible (9). However if the latter mechanism was operative during the reaction of 7 with hydroxylamine, the stable N-aroyl derivative ( l l a ) would arise and not the observed product 100.…”
Section: Fitzroy D Eddy Keith Vaughan Et Malcolm F G Stevens Canmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Features (d) and (e), however, might appear to contradict the intermolecular interpretation but this discrepancy is only apparent : the failure to trap CH30-CO-NH2 in the rearrangement of (1) can be reasonably explained by the much lower reactivity of RO-CO-N H2 with respect to RO-CO-NH-(the reaction between C~HS-CO-CHO and C2H50-CO-NH2 requires several hours at reflux). On the other hand, trapping of the substituted glyoxal by (11) to give a mixture of (11) and (XV) as in Scheme 10, which even though at first sight might appear to restrict the significance of the crossover experiment (a), still indirectly supports the intermolecular interpretation of this rearrangement since Scheme 10 implies the presence of free glyoxal which can only be formed during an intermolecular process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Reaction between (11) and (XVI), and (XV) and (XVII) in the presence of TEA. Solutions of (11) (0.056 g, 0.25 mmol) and (XVI) (0.073 g, 0.025 mmol), or of (XV) (0.25 g, 0.86 mmol) and ( X V I I ) (0.18 g, 0.83 mmol) in dry CH2C12 treated with TEA as previously described and submitted to h.p.1.c.…”
Section: -Methyl-3-hydroxy-23-dihydro-i H-isoindol-1 -One (Xiii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[223] N,N-Dialkylhydroxylamines have also attracted growing interest as pharmacophores or toxophores in drug and agrochemistry. [224][225][226][227][228] In addition, the oxidative metabolism of secondary amines produces N,N-dialkylhydroxylamines. [229][230][231][232] Methods for N,N-dialkylhydroxylamine preparation have been reviewed up to 1990 (see Houben-Weyl, Vol.…”
Section: T-bumentioning
confidence: 99%