2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-017-1070-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Sex Drive, Sociosexuality, and Intended Infidelity

Abstract: Previous research has linked the facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR) to a host of psychological and behavioral characteristics, primarily in men. In two studies, we examined novel links between FWHR and sex drive. In Study 1, a sample of 145 undergraduate students revealed that FWHR positively predicted sex drive. There were no significant FWHR × sex interactions, suggesting that FWHR is linked to sexuality among both men and women. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings in a sample of 314 students col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, number of previous‐year sexual partners and age of first sexual intercourse is predicted by limb muscle volume, but not by fat‐free mass (Lassek & Gaulin, ). Relatedly, more masculine faces are more attractive to women, especially in the context of a ST relationship (Dixson et al, ; Johnston et al, ; Little et al, ; Marcinkowska et al, ; Puts et al, ; Thornhill & Gangestad, ; Valentine et al, ) and more masculine faces are related to unrestricted sociosexual attitudes and number of sexual partners (Arnocky et al, ; Boothroyd et al, ; Boothroyd et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, number of previous‐year sexual partners and age of first sexual intercourse is predicted by limb muscle volume, but not by fat‐free mass (Lassek & Gaulin, ). Relatedly, more masculine faces are more attractive to women, especially in the context of a ST relationship (Dixson et al, ; Johnston et al, ; Little et al, ; Marcinkowska et al, ; Puts et al, ; Thornhill & Gangestad, ; Valentine et al, ) and more masculine faces are related to unrestricted sociosexual attitudes and number of sexual partners (Arnocky et al, ; Boothroyd et al, ; Boothroyd et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, women's attractiveness judgments of facially masculine men vary considerably across studies, being higher for feminized faces in some [20,47], masculinized faces in others [23,48,49], while in several studies women's preferences were equivocal [50]. This variation may be explained by the social costs associated with masculinity in men as facially masculine men report higher preferences for short-term than long-term relationships [51,52], engage in more short-term than long-term relationships [46,53], state greater interest in extra-pair relationships [54], and engage in more extra-pair relationships than royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. Soc. open sci.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[], Arnocky et al. []). Hence, evidence on sexual dimorphism in fWHR is important for supporting this hypothesis (Lefevre et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%