2007
DOI: 10.1177/1352458506069674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Faces Symbol Test, a newly developed screening instrument to assess cognitive decline related to multiple sclerosis: first results of the Berlin Multi-Centre FST Validation Study

Abstract: Reliable, language-independent, short screening instruments to test for cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) remain rare, despite the high number of patients affected by cognitive decline. We developed a new, short screening instrument, the Faces Symbol Test (FST), and compared its diagnostic test characteristics with a composite of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), in 108 MS patients and 33 healthy controls. An Informant-Repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with SN hyperechogenicity tended to have higher scores on the U-UDI compared to those without (1.7 [0.7-2.7] vs. 0.7 [0.3-2.0]; p = 0.075), as did patients with brainstem raphe hypoechogenicity compared to those indicate the referring cut-off value reported to discriminate patients with normal and impaired cognitive function [29]. Note that the patient group with the combined TCS abnormality performed worse on all three tests.…”
Section: Relationship Between Tcs Findings and Urinary Urge Incontinencementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with SN hyperechogenicity tended to have higher scores on the U-UDI compared to those without (1.7 [0.7-2.7] vs. 0.7 [0.3-2.0]; p = 0.075), as did patients with brainstem raphe hypoechogenicity compared to those indicate the referring cut-off value reported to discriminate patients with normal and impaired cognitive function [29]. Note that the patient group with the combined TCS abnormality performed worse on all three tests.…”
Section: Relationship Between Tcs Findings and Urinary Urge Incontinencementioning
confidence: 75%
“…For assessment of cognitive dysfunction, the 3-second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and the Faces Symbol Test (FST) were applied [28,29]. While both PASAT and FST were developed as measures of sustained attention and speed of information processing, these tests have been demonstrated to evaluate different cognitive domains in MS patients, with only a partial correlation between these tests [30].…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive correlation was found between the difficulty in emotional facial expression recognition and the degree of disability [44]. Patients with a higher grade of disability demonstrated greater difficulties in affective prosody recognition [75].…”
Section: Social Cognition Impairments In Ms Depending On the Grade Ofmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Such tasks could be accompanied by pictures. Decoding complex emotions from voice is measured by "Reading the Mind in the Voice" [41] and the "Voice Emotion Identification Test" [42] and prediction of intentions and emotions-by "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" [43] and the "Facial Symbol Test", [44] which are sensitive indicators of the socioperceptual component involved in the immediate recognition of mental states [45]. Even more informative is the "Cambridge Mindreading Face Voice Battery", [46] which combines verbal and dynamic visual stimuli.…”
Section: Clinical Assessment Of Social Cognition In Patients With Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Faces Symbol Test (FST) [8,[19][20][21] is a test that measures attention, working memory and information processing speed. First data suggested a good test-retest reliability for the FST (r = 0.89; internal consistency, Cronbach's α = 0.91) [8] and a satisfactory sensitivity and specificity [19,20].…”
Section: Cognitive Screening In Multiple Sclerosismentioning
confidence: 99%