1968
DOI: 10.3102/00028312005004437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The External Validity of Experiments

Abstract: Shortly after publication, Donald T. Campbell and Julian C. Stanley's "Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching" (1963) gained the status of a classic exposition of experimentation in education. There have been few attempts to extend this pioneering work, as might be expected of a work so comprehensive in conception and so brilliant in execution. Webb et al. (1966) produced a work similar in purposethat being to identify sources of external invalidity which arise from the reactive e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bracht & Glass, 1968). The participants included in the study may not therefore be representative of ultramarathon runners as a population.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bracht & Glass, 1968). The participants included in the study may not therefore be representative of ultramarathon runners as a population.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where analysis of variance is employed then mean outcome scores will be examined at blocked high and low levels of aptitude. A significant F-ratio for interaction, with crossing graphs of cell means, was formerly considered suffcient for disordinality (Lindquist, 1953 ;Lubin, 1961), but Bracht (Bracht and Glass, 1968) proposed more stringent criteria, conservative in relation to the risk of false rejection of the ordinality hypothesis. Differences between outcome means at both high and low levels of the aptitude variable were required to be separately significant, as well as opposite in sign.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in this section, we address some threats to the external validity of our experimental study. External validity refers to which extent our results and findings are applicable to other groups of populations [25]. In our study, we reported a possible threat to external validity that can be encountered, which is the interaction effect of the selection of our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%