1986
DOI: 10.2307/1864385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Against the backdrop of communism weakening the family, we document robust evidence that EC increased the demand for informal family insurance. Although political regimes are argued to result from family structures (Todd, 1985), in this paper we document that exposure to a political regime: Soviet communism increased the strength of family supports (insurance), alongside other forms of insurance. More specifically we show evidence of an average increase in the preference for family support to care for older parents by 10 percentag ponts (pp) and by 4 pp with regards to care and support for pre-school and adult children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Against the backdrop of communism weakening the family, we document robust evidence that EC increased the demand for informal family insurance. Although political regimes are argued to result from family structures (Todd, 1985), in this paper we document that exposure to a political regime: Soviet communism increased the strength of family supports (insurance), alongside other forms of insurance. More specifically we show evidence of an average increase in the preference for family support to care for older parents by 10 percentag ponts (pp) and by 4 pp with regards to care and support for pre-school and adult children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although family structures are argued to reflect the ideologies that have shaped the history of the 20th century (Todd, 1985) and to reinforce inequality (Marx & Engels, 2013), we contend that preferences for family support (or informal family insurance) are endogenous to political regimes. By abolishing formal wealth accumulation, communism might have created parallel informal incentives to develop family networks further, being a source of informal insurance, which we define as the 'informality hypothesis'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Inadequate public support, as well as the cultural celebration of family in the South (Iacovou 2010), make kin coresidence a normative strategy for dealing with longer‐term needs (Esping‐Andersen 1999; Saraceno and Keck 2010; Sobotka 2008b). Financial and practical help take place mostly within the household, perhaps because of limited resources (Isengard, König, and Szydlik 2018) or because of stricter parental authority (Todd 1985). And while the diffusion of growth‐oriented values and public support for working mothers may reduce the willingness and the necessity to engage in multigenerational living arrangements also there (Lesthaeghe 2010; Sobotka 2008b), long‐standing cultural and institutional differences make it unlikely that these family systems will converge (Reher 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work does not measure actual family structure, and self-reported family values may be endogenous to political attitudes. Todd (1985) relates the dominant kinship structure in a country to its system of government. In addition to examining systems of government rather than attitudes, endogeneity also poses serious threats to his framework.…”
Section: Family Ties and The Cultural Evolution Of Value Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%