2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2004.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience of irrigation management transfer in two irrigation schemes in Malawi, 1960s–2002

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Land Act of 1965 provided for the creation of settlement schemes to foster increased peasant production (GOM, 1965). These schemes came to be closely identified with the Malawi Young Pioneers (MYP), a paramilitary wing of the ruling Malawi Congress Party (MCP) (Nkhoma and Mulwafu, 2004). Established in 1965, the MYP was originally a movement meant to integrate the youth into agricultural development.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Land Act of 1965 provided for the creation of settlement schemes to foster increased peasant production (GOM, 1965). These schemes came to be closely identified with the Malawi Young Pioneers (MYP), a paramilitary wing of the ruling Malawi Congress Party (MCP) (Nkhoma and Mulwafu, 2004). Established in 1965, the MYP was originally a movement meant to integrate the youth into agricultural development.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigated agriculture is regarded as a means to boost incomes and food security and is considered a way to reduce poverty by government and donors (Mulwafu and Nkhoma 2002;Mulwafu et al 2003;Ferguson and Mulwafu 2004;Kambewa 2004;Nkhoma and Mulwafu 2004;Peters 2004;Mangisoni 2008;Chidanti-Malunga and Weatherhead 2009). There is a big potential for irrigation in Malawi, which can impact positively on food security, and every effort needs to be taken to harness this potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second category, a central agency (private or government) is responsible for main‐system operation and maintenance, whereas WUAs are responsible for water management at subsystems, typiczally at the tertiary level [ Groenfeldt and Svendsen , 2000; Hearne , 2004; Johnson et al , 2004]. WUAs do not arise spontaneously in most cases but are imposed on farmers in a top‐down way by national governments, NGOs, and international donors [ Abdelhadi et al , 2004; N'Khoma and Mulwafu , 2004; Jamin et al , 2005]. In the process, existing forms of organization are frequently neglected despite the fact that the importance of involving local decision makers in setting up WUAs and building upon existing organizational capacity has been repeatedly pointed out [ Meinzen‐Dick and Reidinger , 1995; Vermillion and Sagardoy , 1999; Mosse , 1999; Sokile and van Koppen , 2004; Maganga et al , 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%