2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
100
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(184 reference statements)
1
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning curve concept originates from a study by Wright [8]. Since then, many studies have been conducted to develop the learning curve method for analyzing the relationships between cumulative production and production cost [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. This study suggests a new application of the learning curve with a presentation of previous models; the variables used within the models are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Learning Curve Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The learning curve concept originates from a study by Wright [8]. Since then, many studies have been conducted to develop the learning curve method for analyzing the relationships between cumulative production and production cost [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. This study suggests a new application of the learning curve with a presentation of previous models; the variables used within the models are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Learning Curve Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many applications of the learning curve method in analyzing the technological development of the energy industry. Samadi [16] examined and compared the learning rate of electricity generation technologies using a number of previous studies. Hong et al [17] calculated the learning rate for photovoltaic power generation in Korea using a two-factor model based on cumulative production and cumulative investment and production costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is no inherent reason that future costs should fall at the same learning rate as in the past (Arrow 1962;Ferioli et al 2009). Moreover, the use of learning rates to understand wind costs has primarily focused on understanding trends in CapEx (Wiser et al 2011;Lindman and Söderholm 2012;Rubin et al 2015;Samadi 2018). Wiser et al (2016) and Williams et al (2017), however, argue that applying learning rates to wind LCOE is more appropriate, because LCOE has been the principal criterion for assessing industry progress and technological advancements, and because reducing CapEx is only one way to reduce wind's LCOE.…”
Section: Estimating Future Opex For Land-based Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the criticisms, the application of learning rates to wind energy remains common (Wiser et al 2011;Lindman and Söderholm 2012;Rubin et al 2015;Samadi 2018), and represents a useful, simple means of estimating future wind costs or reinforcing estimates derived through other methods. Recent analyses suggest historical global learning rates of 6%-9% for land-based wind CapEx, meaning the CapEx has declined by 6%-9% for each doubling of cumulative global installed wind capacity (IRENA 2018;Wiser et al 2016).…”
Section: Estimating Future Opex For Land-based Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation