2013
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201300061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Tumor‐Targeted Drug Delivery: From the EPR Effect to Nanoswimmers

Abstract: Therapeutic nanotechnologies have made great progress over the past decade. Skepticism has been replaced by the understanding that precision at the nanoscale allows improved treatment modalities in humans. Principles for designing tumor‐targeted drug delivery systems are described. At first, the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect was the major targeting mode, with up to 10 % of the injected dose actually reaching tumors. To improve cellular uptake, sugars, antibodies, peptides or other ligands we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to this model, oxygenation of hypoxic tissue due to PFC nanodroplets can only become comparable with enhanced oxygen breathing when the amount of PFC material is both evenly distributed in the tissue and is greater than 8% of the total tumor volume (Supplementary Figure S4). However, since no more than ~10% of total injected nanoscale agents typically accumulate inside solid tumors through the EPR effect 86, practically achieving such a high volume ratio in the tumor as predicted by the model is unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to this model, oxygenation of hypoxic tissue due to PFC nanodroplets can only become comparable with enhanced oxygen breathing when the amount of PFC material is both evenly distributed in the tissue and is greater than 8% of the total tumor volume (Supplementary Figure S4). However, since no more than ~10% of total injected nanoscale agents typically accumulate inside solid tumors through the EPR effect 86, practically achieving such a high volume ratio in the tumor as predicted by the model is unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the vaginal drug delivery route has been known since ancient times (Hussain & Ahsan 2005), the idea of utilizing sperm-hybrid micro-bio-robot for fertilization as well as the possibility to use the synthetic attachment to carry anti-cancer drugs have been conceived (Magdanz & Schmidt 2014). Therapeutics may be attached to sperm cells together with synthetic attachments to guide their motion or incorporated into the sperm head to take advantage of the sperm's abilities to protect molecular cargo and deliver it from cell to cell (Zoabi et al 2013). Such a target cell might also be the oocyte; for example, to deliver genes or diagnostic tools with the sperm directly in the process of fertilization.…”
Section: Targeted Drug Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive targeting is solely dependent on Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect [2,3] Active targeting on the other hand can be of two types; (i) homing to disease sites by loading targeting agents with ligands or antibodies that bind specifically to biomarkers uniquely expressed/secreted in diseased regions [4] or (ii) self-propelling drug carriers [5]. EPR is a direct effect of poor and leaky vasculature that is normally seen in disease sites (e.g., tumor microenvironments) and is only effective for upto 10% retention of therapeutics at these sites [6]. While antibody and ligand directed nanoparticles show high levels of specific uptake by diseased cells, their targeting rates were still found to be low, as their accumulation in target sites (< 10%) is still dependent on the EPR effect [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%