2016
DOI: 10.5194/hess-20-4775-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of root-zone moisture capacities after deforestation: a step towards hydrological predictions under change?

Abstract: Abstract. The core component of many hydrological systems, the moisture storage capacity available to vegetation, is impossible to observe directly at the catchment scale and is typically treated as a calibration parameter or obtained from a priori available soil characteristics combined with estimates of rooting depth. Often this parameter is considered to remain constant in time. Using long-term data (30–40 years) from three experimental catchments that underwent significant land cover change, we tested the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(149 reference statements)
4
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When zooming out to the macroscale, the time-dynamic connectivity of these structures frequently emerges as simple functional relationships with system wetness (e.g. Detty and McGuire, 2010;Penna et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum Of The Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When zooming out to the macroscale, the time-dynamic connectivity of these structures frequently emerges as simple functional relationships with system wetness (e.g. Detty and McGuire, 2010;Penna et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum Of The Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they also involve a plethora of (often difficult to validate) assumptions in their model structures and parameters. In practice, parameters set during calibration are rarely changed to account for changes in the modelled processes under future conditions, although by calibrating models for conditions similar to the expected future conditions, it may be possible to incorporate nonstationary parameter values (Nijzink et al, 2016). This idea could be integrated into DBM models by choosing identification periods which are most likely to reflect the conditions of the simulation period or through the use of state-dependent parameters.…”
Section: Advantages and Limitations Of The Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…different mixtures of species), age distribution of the plants in the system, the density of plants (i.e. individual plants per unit area) or, being mostly snapshots in time, temporally evolving root systems (de Boer-Euser et al, 2016;Nijzink et al, 2016b;Savenije and Hrachowitz, 2017). In addition, the available meteorological forcing data may be overly smooth and/or unrepresentative due to the methods used to interpolate station data from sparse observing networks.…”
Section: Modelling Myths -Or Not?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potentially effective starting point for the latter is to use observations at the modelling scale to infer information about the functional shapes and to quantify the actual parameters of individual processes at that scale. Examples include the concept of master recession curves (Lamb and Beven, 1997) or the water holding capacity in the unsaturated root zone (S U,max ), which is the core of many hydrological systems as it controls the partitioning of drainage and evaporative fluxes (Gao et al, 2014b;de Boer-Euser et al, 2016;Nijzink et al, 2016b). These system components integrate heterogeneities and quantify actual physical properties present and physical processes active at the observation and modelling scale.…”
Section: Modelling Myths -Or Not?mentioning
confidence: 99%