HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology

Abstract

Abstract. In hydrology, two somewhat competing philosophies form the basis of most process-based models. At one endpoint of this continuum are detailed, high-resolution descriptions of small-scale processes that are numerically integrated to larger scales (e.g. catchments). At the other endpoint of the continuum are spatially lumped representations of the system that express the hydrological response via, in the extreme case, a single linear transfer function. Many other models, developed starting from these two contrasting endpoints, plot along this continuum with different degrees of spatial resolutions and process complexities. A better understanding of the respective basis as well as the respective shortcomings of different modelling philosophies has the potential to improve our models. In this paper we analyse several frequently communicated beliefs and assumptions to identify, discuss and emphasize the functional similarity of the seemingly competing modelling philosophies. We argue that deficiencies in model applications largely do not depend on the modelling philosophy, although some models may be more suitable for specific applications than others and vice versa, but rather on the way a model is implemented. Based on the premises that any model can be implemented at any desired degree of detail and that any type of model remains to some degree conceptual, we argue that a convergence of modelling strategies may hold some value for advancing the development of hydrological models.

The Demographics of Water: A Review of Water Ages in the Critical Zone

“…Spatially distributed, continuum-based hydrological models (Hrachowitz & Clark, 2017) are also being increasingly used to simulate time-varying TTDs by tracking the age of particles of water as they flow through the catchment (Davies et al, 2013;Maxwell et al, 2016;Danesh-Yazdi et al, 2018;Remondi et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2018;Figure 3d. In these models, mixing hypotheses can be formulated at smaller scales.…”

The Value of Using Multiple Hydrometeorological Variables to Predict Temporal Debris Flow Susceptibility in an Alpine Environment

“…Figure shows the model structure that includes several storage components, representing snow and glacier, interception, unsaturated soil, fast responding, and slow responding system components individually for each precipitation zone. To ensure a balance between necessary spatial detail of the model and available data to meaningfully constrain the model parameter space (Hrachowitz & Clark, ), the model domain was discretized into six individual precipitation zones, which corresponds to the highest resolution of available information on precipitation (as the main driver for debris flow initiation). In addition, each precipitation zone was further subdivided into four hydrological response units to distinguish between different response dynamics of forest, grassland, sparsely vegetated/bare rock, which represents hillslope units on the one hand and riparian zones with shallow groundwater tables (and thus little unsaturated storage capacities) on the other hand (cf.…”

Assessing effects of model complexity and structure on predictions of hydrological responses using serial and parallel model design

“…direct precipitation runoff and base flow. This total discharge is then used to evaluate computations of water fluxes coming from multiple sources irrespective of the structural complexity of the model (Fenicia, Savenije, Matgen, & Pfister, ; Hrachowitz & Clark, ; Sivapalan et al, ). Even as models of surface runoff and water yield increase in complexity, their reliance on process understanding largely acquired at small scales means they cannot reliably account for dominant processes at watershed scales.…”