1972
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.03.110172.001025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Resistance to Pesticides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
201
0
48

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
201
0
48
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection exercised by insecticides and the capacity of dispersion of a species are important information for the adoption of resistance management strategies (Georghiou 1972, Scott et al 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selection exercised by insecticides and the capacity of dispersion of a species are important information for the adoption of resistance management strategies (Georghiou 1972, Scott et al 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors influence the evolution of the resistance to insecticides (Georghiou 1972, Roush & Daly 1990, Mallet 1993, Hoy et al 1998. Among these, the frequency of insecticide applications and migration of resistant populations are of primary importance for the stored-product insects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory suggests that selection within a continuous phenotypic distribution, such as a small laboratory population, favors selection of a polygenic response whereas selection for phenotypes outside of the original phenotypic range, such as selection of a field population with an insecticide, favors a monogenic response involving a rare variant (Georghiou 1972;Roush and McKenzie 1987;ffrench-Constant et al 1990). Thus, although the intensity and pattern of selection may be similar in the field and the laboratory (Groeters and Tabashnik 2000), only the heterogeneous nature of field populations allows for the selection of the rare variants that correspond to resistance alleles likely to trigger control failure.…”
Section: Laboratory Vs Field Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma das aspectos fundamentais para a implementação de estratégias de manejo da resistência é conhecer a dinâmica da resistência em condições de campo; isto é, desenvolver estudos que avaliem as mudanças na freqüência de resistência no decorrer do tempo (Georghiou 1972, Dennehy et al 1990, Omoto et al 1995. Em situações em que a resistência é instável, isto é, quando sua freqüência se reduz signifi cativamente na ausência de pressão de seleção, a instabilidade pode ser explorada em programas de manejo da resistência.…”
unclassified