2006
DOI: 10.1353/eas.2006.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Institutions and Rules Governing Communal Grazing Lands in Botswana

Abstract: This paper traces the tradition and evolution of the institutions and rules governing communal grazing lands in Botswana. It shows how the problem of resource overuse arose partly from the dismantling and delegitimization of traditional resource management institutions that occurred during the colonial period, and was later reinforced by a newly independent government, increased market activity, high population pressure and other changes. While privatization has been the most popular policy prescription to add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from the workshop and policy analysis reveal that privatisation of communal lands is still viewed as a superior solution to the rangeland management problems in communal areas. Several studies point out that TGLP was implemented based on questionable epistemological grounds and has yielded little evidence that it has achieved its intended SLM objectives (Basupi et al, ; Makepe, ; Perkins, ; White, ). Political ‘lock‐in’ to a policy of land privatisation limits efforts to empower local communities to manage communal rangelands.…”
Section: Discussion: Torwards Slmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from the workshop and policy analysis reveal that privatisation of communal lands is still viewed as a superior solution to the rangeland management problems in communal areas. Several studies point out that TGLP was implemented based on questionable epistemological grounds and has yielded little evidence that it has achieved its intended SLM objectives (Basupi et al, ; Makepe, ; Perkins, ; White, ). Political ‘lock‐in’ to a policy of land privatisation limits efforts to empower local communities to manage communal rangelands.…”
Section: Discussion: Torwards Slmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, kgotla is a form of commons and commoning. Numerous commons scholars have researched kgotla as commons, dating back to at least the 1990s [15]; however, this research focuses on kgotla management of natural resource systems like grazing land [6,7]. There is no known commons literature that extends kgotla practices beyond natural resource management to social policy areas like blood services.…”
Section: Botswana Kgotlamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with Global North counterparts, Botswana possesses an Indigenous governance system, kgotla, which exists at both village level and national level as the House of Chiefs (Ntlo ya Dikgosi) in Parliament. The kgotla have long been recognized as a form of commoning [6,7], making governance in Botswana, in principle, a dual state-commons system. Despite the formal recognition of the state-commons arrangement in Botswana, the state has not engaged the kgotla as a partner to address trust in healthcare services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Botswana's rural people are mostly rural village dwellers and their pastoral activities assume the form of transhumance under a three-tier settlement system, whereby rural village dwellers commute between villages, land areas and temporary, encampments known as cattle posts, where livestock are kept [48]. Traditionally, communal rangelands have been managed by traditional institutions which allow for inter-territorial grazing between unfixed tribal boundaries so that animals can access forage and water even in times of stress, such as drought years [49]. Change in environmental conditions has always influenced pastoral livelihoods in Botswana [2].…”
Section: Reviewing Botswana's Rangeland Policymentioning
confidence: 99%