2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-006-0409-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution of fertilization modes independent of the micropyle in Fagales and `pseudoporogamy'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, we have accumulated data on the mode of pollen tube growth for five of the eight families of the Fagales (Sogo et al. , 2004a, b; Sogo & Tobe, 2005, 2006a, b, c). Studies on the remaining families, that is, Juglandaceae, Rhoipteleaceae and Nothofagaceae, would allow us to make an extensive comparison and evaluate how the mode of pollen tube growth has evolved, which would also reflect the phylogenetic relationships in the order Fagales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus far, we have accumulated data on the mode of pollen tube growth for five of the eight families of the Fagales (Sogo et al. , 2004a, b; Sogo & Tobe, 2005, 2006a, b, c). Studies on the remaining families, that is, Juglandaceae, Rhoipteleaceae and Nothofagaceae, would allow us to make an extensive comparison and evaluate how the mode of pollen tube growth has evolved, which would also reflect the phylogenetic relationships in the order Fagales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 23 is an improved diagram of information presented in a previous paper (Sogo & Tobe, 2006b), emphasizing the distribution of chalazogamy in a phylogenetic tree of the Fagales [data of the outgroups Hamamelis and Celtis were obtained from Mathew (1980) and Dottori (1994), respectively]. The figure shows that porogamy is a plesiomorphy in the Fagales, although this has yet to be confirmed in Nothofagus , and that chalazogamy is an apomorphy gained once in a common ancestor of the Juglandaceae, Rhoipteleaceae, Myricaceae, Betulaceae, Ticodendraceae and Casuarinaceae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations