1997
DOI: 10.2307/1144076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice Reform

Abstract: Both authors gratefully acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation for its support of this project. This paper was presented at the Symposium on New Directions in Juvenile Justice at the University of Pennsylvania Law School in May 1997. We thank participants at that symposium for comments. We also thankJohn Monahan, Dick Reppucci, and Frank Zimring for comments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Suspects who have limited cognitive abilities may be at risk of misinterpreting and thus, waiving their rights, despite it being against their best interests. For instance, young people may be at a disadvantage given that higher order cognitive skills and decision-making skills continue to develop across childhood and well into adolescence (Peterson-Badali et al 1999;Scott and Grisso 1997). Youth have also been found to display an increased propensity to comply with authority figures, sometimes at the expense of acting in their own best interest (Grisso et al 2003).…”
Section: Factors That Influence Legal Rights Waiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspects who have limited cognitive abilities may be at risk of misinterpreting and thus, waiving their rights, despite it being against their best interests. For instance, young people may be at a disadvantage given that higher order cognitive skills and decision-making skills continue to develop across childhood and well into adolescence (Peterson-Badali et al 1999;Scott and Grisso 1997). Youth have also been found to display an increased propensity to comply with authority figures, sometimes at the expense of acting in their own best interest (Grisso et al 2003).…”
Section: Factors That Influence Legal Rights Waiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, just over half of the legislation reviewed fails to articulate that the needs of the young offender should be a priority. Young offenders are more amenable to treatment and more likely to benefit from rehabilitation efforts than their adult counterparts (Scott &Grisso, 1997) and, as such, one would expect a focus on the provision of empirically-based rehabilitative services to young people. Unfortunately, this has not been the case in many jurisdictions (see Day & Casey, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orders based on the rehabilitation theory are given when the court finds that the child offender has not received parental guidance, care or observation, or has been living in a state of poverty which has denied him an education (Grisso, 1997). This further shows that only the rehabilitation theory is capable of solving the problems faced by such children.…”
Section: The Application Of the Rehabilitation Theory In Sentencing Cmentioning
confidence: 99%