2013
DOI: 10.1179/1947461x13z.0000000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evolution of a Cemetery: Rapid Change in Burial Practices in a Middle Holocene Site in Central Alta California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the co-occurence of diverse burial postures (e.g., flexed vs. extended) at CA-CCO-548 shows little variation through time, burial orientation (e.g., orientation of head with respect to true north) was quadrimodal, with modes clearly oriented to the cardinal directions (N, S, E, W). As well, orientations changed markedly in relative frequency throughout the occupation sequence, as did the spatial location of the active part of the cemetery (Eerkens et al, 2013b). Together the mortuary evidence shows that the cemetery was formed in a deliberate manner, with some burials showing traits similar to Windmiller populations from the Central Valley (e.g., extended burials) and others with traits more similar to Lower Berkeley populations (e.g., flexed burials) from the Bay Area.…”
Section: Ca-cco-548 (Marsh Creek)mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the co-occurence of diverse burial postures (e.g., flexed vs. extended) at CA-CCO-548 shows little variation through time, burial orientation (e.g., orientation of head with respect to true north) was quadrimodal, with modes clearly oriented to the cardinal directions (N, S, E, W). As well, orientations changed markedly in relative frequency throughout the occupation sequence, as did the spatial location of the active part of the cemetery (Eerkens et al, 2013b). Together the mortuary evidence shows that the cemetery was formed in a deliberate manner, with some burials showing traits similar to Windmiller populations from the Central Valley (e.g., extended burials) and others with traits more similar to Lower Berkeley populations (e.g., flexed burials) from the Bay Area.…”
Section: Ca-cco-548 (Marsh Creek)mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Here we present stable carbon and nitrogen isotope data from human bone collagen and bone bioapatite from 248 individuals who were buried in the northern part of CA-CCO-548, located along Marsh Creek near the eastern edge of the Central California Delta. AMS dates on 148 burials range between 5420 and 2975 cal B.P., indicating these individuals were interred mainly during the middle part of the Holocene (Eerkens et al, 2013b). Other studies indicate that southern portions of the site continued to be used through the Late Holocene until the time of contact (Burns et al, 2016;Ralston and Fitzgerald, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For instance, it might be that the lack of cultural changes are a product of factors examined. Eerkens, Bartelink, Gardner, and Wiberg () have pointed out that some factors of burial methods may reflect long term traditions that may be shared across tribes whereas other factors, such as burial positions, may change swiftly and tell us more than the stable markers. In short, one might expect to see cultural variation with a new population migrating into the area; however, it must be noted that cultural continuities in the form of artifacts, behaviors, or even languages do not equal biological continuities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…start and end dates for each group), we performed further tests of their relative ordering using the ‘Order’ function [42]. Finally, in order to explore possible connections transecting burial traditions, we repeated our analyses (uniform, trapezoid, and outlier models) with our dates grouped according to burial position, which has been identified as a comparatively stable marker of cultural or biological connections [43]. For these ‘burial position’ analyses, only direct dates on human bones were included in the model, and all animal bones and satellite features were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%