1979
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1979.58
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolution and breakdown of S-allele systems

Abstract: SUMMARYWe have examined a model proposed by East (1929) for the evolution of gametophytic self-incompatibility allele systems, starting from populations with a self-fertility allele. The original self-fertility allele is not eliminated from the population when three active S alleles have been incorporated, but self-fertility alleles can coexist with S alleles. In order to examine this coexistence more fully, we studied the invasion of self-incompatible populations containing various numbers of S alleles (all a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
127
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a frequency of the self-compatible genotype of 0014, and the frequency of heterozygotes for the self-compatibility allele was 0277. Such populations therefore have intermediate selfing rates, as previously found also by Charlesworth and Charlesworth (1979b) for the case of gametophytic action, when self-compatibility alleles are introduced into the population. This situation is different from other models that yield intermediate selfing rates as their evolutionary outcome (reviewed in Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1987), in that it arises from the nature of the genetic control of the compatibility versus incompatibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds to a frequency of the self-compatible genotype of 0014, and the frequency of heterozygotes for the self-compatibility allele was 0277. Such populations therefore have intermediate selfing rates, as previously found also by Charlesworth and Charlesworth (1979b) for the case of gametophytic action, when self-compatibility alleles are introduced into the population. This situation is different from other models that yield intermediate selfing rates as their evolutionary outcome (reviewed in Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1987), in that it arises from the nature of the genetic control of the compatibility versus incompatibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This is what one would expect to find if the different alleles evolved from an ancestral inactive allele, assuming that the only alleles likely to invade the population would be ones with new S specificities not already present (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1979b); thus new alleles arising by mutation would be unlikely to spread if they occurred in alleles that were already active in the population, but an allele derived from S by changing a different amino acid site from those present in existing alleles could invade, provided that it produced a protein with an S specificity. Different alleles produced in this way would therefore differ by at least two amino acids from one another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classical theory dictates that an allele conferring SC should either be able to spread to fixation, if inbreeding depression can be purged, or should be rapidly lost, if not (eg, Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1979;Lande and Schemske, 1985). Recent theory suggests, in contrast, that SI and SC alleles may stably coexist under certain conditions (Uyenoyama et al, 2001;Porcher and Lande, 2005).…”
Section: Breakdown Of Si Permits Short-term Allelic Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inbreeding depression decreases as population size becomes smaller due to reduced polymorphism for selection to act on (Bataillon and Kirkpatrick, 2000). Charlesworth and Charlesworth (1979) showed that the number of S-alleles also is important in maintaining SI, because a low number of alleles will limit the number of compatible crosses in the population. A decrease in population size can also cause a reduction in the number of S-alleles (Brennan et al, 2003), and a self-compatible mutant can be positively selected for (Reinartz and Les, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%