1988
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1988.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility

Abstract: A population genetic model is described for the evolution of sporophytic self-incompatibility by successive mutations to active incompatibility alleles from an ancestral compatibility, Sf, allele, homozygotes for which are capable of selffertilisation. For spread of the active incompatibility alleles there must be strong inbreeding depression. It is shown that polymorphism for the ancestral allele and the active alleles is generated, unless the number of active alleles becomes very large. Thus, although there … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these populations, 48% fewer seeds were produced by selffertilization (Table 1), and there was significant inbreeding depression for eight of the 11 traits ( Table 2). The relatively large 54% declines in male and female fitness caused by self-fertilization are consistent with the idea that inbreeding depression may generate and maintain genetically controlled self-incompatibility systems in plants (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1979;Lande and Schemske, 1985;Charlesworth, 1988;Lloyd, 1992). In contrast, inbreeding depression was detected for only a single trait in self-compatible populations (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In these populations, 48% fewer seeds were produced by selffertilization (Table 1), and there was significant inbreeding depression for eight of the 11 traits ( Table 2). The relatively large 54% declines in male and female fitness caused by self-fertilization are consistent with the idea that inbreeding depression may generate and maintain genetically controlled self-incompatibility systems in plants (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1979;Lande and Schemske, 1985;Charlesworth, 1988;Lloyd, 1992). In contrast, inbreeding depression was detected for only a single trait in self-compatible populations (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is because a rare haplotype has a transmission advantage since it is not denied mating opportunities by meeting its own phenotype as often as a common haplotype. At a deterministic equilibrium stabilized by selection, GSI haplotypes (and phenotypes) have equal frequencies, whereas for SSI, dominance may cause some haplotypes (the recessive ones) to have higher frequencies than other (dominant) ones (Sampson 1967;Charlesworth 1988;Schierup et al 1997). However, more than one haplotype at a given dominance level decreases the frequency of each haplotype at that dominance level, when there is dominance in pollen and codominance in the stigma (Sampson 1974).…”
Section: H Omomorphic Self-incompatibility (Si) Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the spontaneous hatching of a small proportion of unfertilized eggs in a normally sexually reproducing species; White 1964White , 1973Suomalainen et al 1987). Tychoparthenogenesis is widespread in sexual invertebrates (Bell 1982) and has also been reported in vertebrate species (Chapman et al 2007;Lampert 2008;Schut et al 2008); it is presumed to occur because errors during the meiotic divisions can result in the production of diploid instead of haploid oocytes. Diploidy in these oocytes is usually restored either by fusion of one of the three polar bodies with the oocyte or an additional step of chromosome duplication ('automixis'; White 1964White , 1973Suomalainen et al 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%